Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec

Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@juniper.net> Fri, 31 August 2012 22:37 UTC

Return-Path: <gmaxwell@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B48B21F846F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L5TMMLXRPGd8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og111.obsmtp.com (exprod7og111.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F22E921F846B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob111.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUEE8lELWRYvgL2dDNBBrlWqcrj/Nj0v+@postini.com; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:37:11 PDT
Received: from EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::c821:7c81:f21f:8bc7]) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::fc92:eb1:759:2c72%11]) with mapi; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:36:10 -0700
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@juniper.net>
To: Randall Gellens <randy@qualcomm.com>, John Leslie <john@jlc.net>, Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:35:02 -0700
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec
Thread-Index: Ac2HxqJFXnIEwzpIRoyYCJDAgxxCWQAAjo6D
Message-ID: <BCB3F026FAC4C145A4A3330806FEFDA9414A0FD104@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
References: <p06240603cc63f3f41ca9@[99.111.97.136]> <503F46C5.2090607@alvestrand.no> <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE240CBCCD8@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel- lucent.com> <503F61CC.1010709@alvestrand.no> <CAC8DBE4E9704C41BCB290C2F3CC921A162D278D@nasanexd01h.na.qualcomm.com> <503FC1BF.5020004@alvestrand.no> <CAC8DBE4E9704C41BCB290C2F3CC921A162D2B0F@nasanexd01h.na.qualcomm.com> <5040541C.5020008@alvestrand.no> <20120831133845.GW72831@verdi> <5040CE32.5050003@jesup.org> <20120831151247.GY72831@verdi>, <p06240608cc66e4862829@[99.111.97.136]>
In-Reply-To: <p06240608cc66e4862829@[99.111.97.136]>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB needs an Internet Codec
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:37:12 -0000

Randall Gellens [randy@qualcomm.com] wrote:
> We can pick G.711 as MTI and rely on implementers to support others.

And then end up with a specification which is not actually interoperable for but a fraction of the well known intended applications.