Re: [rtcweb] draft-ibc-rtcweb-sip-websocket -- WebSocket Transport for Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)

Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saul@ag-projects.com> Fri, 16 September 2011 06:48 UTC

Return-Path: <saul@ag-projects.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4807921F8BBC for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 23:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.628
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.628 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JMeSqcbg8zwb for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 23:48:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sipthor.net (node06.dns-hosting.info [85.17.186.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E7A21F8BAA for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 23:48:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.sipthor.net (Postfix, from userid 5001) id 96C0DB01B8; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 08:51:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.99.36] (ip3e830637.speed.planet.nl [62.131.6.55]) by mail.sipthor.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 01ABFB019A; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 08:51:03 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sa=FAl_Ibarra_Corretg=E9?= <saul@ag-projects.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxs7QHk46hjQRhXbZ2Gh=GLQJ7J0dvaRq0tQd5O9tO8qhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 08:51:03 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6A37608C-95E1-4BDA-8F66-55E4785ABC2E@ag-projects.com>
References: <CABw3bnO+85i-TtuqS+P4n+rYgyxyoASc8HXpADhy4QPTC0_szA@mail.gmail.com> <6F469757-6B5C-4DC9-BC34-026F34C7E508@phonefromhere.com> <CAD5OKxvCSJWS+F72P_WOFapmtffkLCSSe3A-rDEUOhNjWcoh4A@mail.gmail.com> <4E72384F.3080202@jesup.org> <CAD5OKxs7QHk46hjQRhXbZ2Gh=GLQJ7J0dvaRq0tQd5O9tO8qhQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>, rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] draft-ibc-rtcweb-sip-websocket -- WebSocket Transport for Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 06:48:52 -0000

Hi,

On Sep 15, 2011, at 7:52 PM, Roman Shpount wrote:

> I don't think this is a problem for RTC web to resolve. This is the same problem that someone building an IM or email client for a web browser will need to deal with. Some type of push notification framework is needed to implement this and it might be something for W3C to standardize as a solution for this problem. 

I fully agree here. AFAIK this group is not about getting applications to run smoothly on mobile platforms, it's about realtime communications within a browser. Having a JS SIP client on a browser might be OK for a desktop, but mobiles will always need native apps because they can be optimized for specific hardware and give a better user experience IMHO. That being said, I don't think mobile battery consumption is important in any way when discussing SIP over WebSocket.


Regards,

--
Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
AG Projects