IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] UDP transport problem

cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> Thu, 13 February 2014 22:52 UTC

Return-Path: <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B04501A007F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:52:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uW8RhBDACayK for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:52:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-f179.google.com (mail-ig0-f179.google.com [209.85.213.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2D81A010B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:51:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f179.google.com with SMTP id c10so13965523igq.0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:51:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sLwJcvGnDrr/SaW43bmxchXwVbs5sYLqmAUT309rEw4=; b=T1ImlTw0wyt+6+0Vpm96QMb9yi2wkDQNq/Oh780a3pAKMmTPy5HOaqL+8o5v3g6twd lkhxnmn9zTnJybnH7bRJWnqcctSnOAsyob6rhEROct+b9E8zicvhz3qFj1v7YNOt85HM jupbe4YqVDkZQZZ5ixuMfDTPDBW0/SNW3Rft5DsDFyHlGecsMkN3dGomPrnh1UAEt5OR hF5i6eG6QQWQyT05qeHIMp7s/VIBVU8kWPy6SXCS8dFji5pgPQsXKVtD3+SMCHWqv1wT 6yeZfAiKtpOuV12jWs7ZqhO/r5LFqYoZWoyK4J1jVGia//W3l6eVCtZ5iNKTSNbqApae MvjQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlqOw19xR+OHmLIiYMT5/2r4ZF/c5x/pResdMmcGdgPqxjuSiutCHeY0t1Ba1moPGrYAMaQ
X-Received: by 10.50.66.129 with SMTP id f1mr5648197igt.26.1392331918127; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:51:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (206-248-171-209.dsl.teksavvy.com. [206.248.171.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bf7sm10712345igb.9.2014.02.13.14.51.56 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:51:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52FD4C82.8040300@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:51:46 -0500
From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
References: <CAD6AjGRiQ1UF5n3JG9HPRQFM+TD54Xz-dpTn5u9bX+__BMfesQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnVbZp7yBvpY1ARuaBXS=TOipY=BhXzrd=h5DY-76oF9Pw@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGSxS4jNRGotsE_no0XhewvDqcVZ+Kmx1aMW9qorqSKR+w@mail.gmail.com> <52FD2FA4.8040701@alvestrand.no> <CAD6AjGTbSJEV2cJj5QyLktyZPv8SJa7h-QHKVtdUXnF3K6xwHA@mail.gmail.com> <52FD46F4.7030804@bbs.darktech.org> <CAA93jw4_+xAVza-YDpPD80Fj749i=vgOSz7sAty_Zp4U2TuO6g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4_+xAVza-YDpPD80Fj749i=vgOSz7sAty_Zp4U2TuO6g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/cueY_K52n8C9qfcc6HH-LvKZDLI
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] UDP transport problem
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 22:52:03 -0000

On 13/02/2014 5:46 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> The biggest downside, as I see it, is targeting advancements in the state of
> the art, at windows. 98% of the world or so run non-windows based cell
> phones and tablets, and in terms of total users, probably outnumber
> the windows contingent at this point.
>
> SCTP and MPTCP are quite feasible on android and IOS.

It doesn't matter how many smartphones there are. What matters is how 
many of them will be used to do meaningful video chat. The screen real 
estate on these devices is way too small.

So yes, mobile is huge, but from the point of view of WebRTC, Windows is 
still king.

Gili

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email