IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives

"Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)" <mzanaty@cisco.com> Thu, 28 November 2013 04:33 UTC

Return-Path: <mzanaty@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82091AE0C1 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:33:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XeJmASUz02_O for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:33:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9AF11ADF87 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:33:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=586; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1385613221; x=1386822821; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=qLSoxF9QnNAlDwmqTDV/2QUfr4sH+vYpagP/dcTxt9A=; b=A9Hml3nYgftjctggetiP9tinCQLHE2Y5+fsZ41LmoP7W5oFfhvy+WyDC xlHeUzlDoKD4/bF126i2UqgSCsZbEbQbKtaJEIV4pwXDEaZPA3aed6Vty qhPgxLtQldw+bAFswBEpcG0lwmJNoL4zkW8pRVOlq8MnYdu2R5EbFjMIG 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFAG7HllKtJXG//2dsb2JhbABZgweBC7hEgR8WdIIlAQEBBHkQAgEIDgouMiUCBA4FiAG/bBePAgeEMwOJCo8KkhODKYIq
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,788,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="288131069"
Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Nov 2013 04:33:37 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com [173.37.183.86]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rAS4XaxS000599 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 28 Nov 2013 04:33:36 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.50]) by xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com ([173.37.183.86]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 22:33:36 -0600
From: "Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)" <mzanaty@cisco.com>
To: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives
Thread-Index: AQHO6/MADuQaJxvLekG6Km6teA6Taw==
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 04:33:36 +0000
Message-ID: <CEBC2BF3.1F597%mzanaty@cisco.com>
References: <CEBBC7E7.1F4ED%mzanaty@cisco.com> <529680EF.4010908@jitsi.org>
In-Reply-To: <529680EF.4010908@jitsi.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
x-originating-ip: [10.82.213.54]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <87B334C3FDDAD0468BDFF17A0130FA9A@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 04:33:43 -0000

On 11/27/13, 6:31 PM, Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> wrote:
> On 27.11.13, 22:42, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty) wrote:
>> Several folks have objected to a vote. Is it worthwhile to have an
>> alternative that expresses this?
>> "Voting MUST NOT be used to decide MTI video codec(s).²
>> I realize it is whacky to ask someone to vote to express an objection
>> to voting.
> It is indeed quite ironic.
And quite idiotic. Since we will have a normal consensus call starting
soon to accept or reject this alternative process, which I completely
overlooked. Sorry for the stupid suggestion.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email