Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB Data Channel: Usage of PPID for protocol multiplexing

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Thu, 06 February 2014 19:37 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05931A047A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 11:37:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FdmLiCjzXA4z for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 11:37:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC8A41A0479 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 11:37:40 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7f038e000005d01-5e-52f3e482674e
Received: from ESESSHC007.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 16.19.23809.284E3F25; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 20:37:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.99]) by ESESSHC007.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.39]) with mapi id 14.02.0387.000; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 20:37:38 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] RTCWEB Data Channel: Usage of PPID for protocol multiplexing
Thread-Index: AQHPI1gvNJfae3lhY0u4MlWMQPDTNpqojGQAgAASM8o=
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 19:37:38 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D160930@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D15E955@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <74072016-DA11-41E8-9944-779428163EE4@lurchi.franken.de> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D15ED94@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <4CE22DF8-DE34-400A-95AE-2E011828DE88@lurchi.franken.de> <52F3B7A5.6070105@alum.mit.edu>, <3B7B334C-868A-4128-B7BF-07C66B649443@lurchi.franken.de>
In-Reply-To: <3B7B334C-868A-4128-B7BF-07C66B649443@lurchi.franken.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.147]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrMLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW7Tk89BBuuP2FhcbFrCaLFiwwFW i7X/2tkdmD3+vv/A5LFkyU8mjw0tO5gCmKO4bFJSczLLUov07RK4MpZeucZU8ISpYtfd36wN jDOYuhg5OSQETCRO7u5khLDFJC7cW88GYgsJHGKUeLxet4uRC8hexCix7/J95i5GDg42AQuJ 7n/aIDUiArESlz9vAKtnFlCXuLP4HDuILSwQIvFkaxcbRE2oxM3pP4DmswPZVhLvBUGiLAIq EitXnQO7gFfAV2JL1xw2iE2PmCReT9jFDJLgFHCV+HXuL5jNCHTa91NrmCBWiUvcejIf6nwB iSV7zjND2KISLx//YwW5UkJASWLa1jSIch2JBbs/QV2pLbFs4WtmiL2CEidnPmGZwCg2C8nU WUhaZiFpmYWkZQEjyypG9tzEzJz0cqNNjMCIObjlt+oOxjvnRA4xSnOwKInzfnjrHCQkkJ5Y kpqdmlqQWhRfVJqTWnyIkYmDU6qB0fH8yk8stjcMJva/Ttn6TkRtz6GSkrWhsV21S1VV2KO6 5gvtdEh0MHpf4FXvfCxhjrK+VKFzmuth3UP7wiVSF05vcJ4bd+auxDuOXXne2f3nNTnm/lIS sYs2nDrxCfNaI4nrM9pSuXgPyQgt/BTy1OnT7PCs5dO1BbPy8m4x+C639v7L8URAiaU4I9FQ i7moOBEAlVGOAmYCAAA=
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB Data Channel: Usage of PPID for protocol multiplexing
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 19:37:43 -0000

Hi,

>> I hope that if values are retained simply for backward compatibility they are explicitly marked as deprecated.
> My plan was just not to defined what they are used for...

I would like to have some explanation text. Having registered values without any kind of explanation is not a good approach, in my opinion.

Regards,

Christer