Re: [rtcweb] rtcweb-transports reference to TRAM discovery

[Adam Roach <[e-mail]>]

On 12/19/14 10:58, Suhas Nandakumar wrote:
> But having flexibility is not a bad idea , thus i feel the spec needs 
> to just say the plausible options but mandating with MUST might not be 
> what we need here.

I think you're falling into the trap of not distinguishing between "MUST 
implement" and "MUST use".

I'm not necessarily arguing that this is a "MUST implement" requirement 
on browsers[1], but if we're going to figure out what makes sense, we 
need to think about this properly.

/a

____
[1] I'd love to see this kind of discovery deployed universally, since I 
believe it contributes to the long-term success of WebRTC, but I'd like 
to hear other people's arguments for/against doing so before taking a 
concrete position.