Re: [rtcweb] RTCWeb default signaling protocol [was RE: Aboutdefining a signaling protocol for WebRTC (or not)]

Randell Jesup <> Thu, 22 September 2011 20:05 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AEFA11E8099 for <>; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 13:05:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.611
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.611 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.012, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k97TjDnYMt35 for <>; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 13:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB55811E8091 for <>; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 13:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([] helo=[]) by with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <>) id 1R6pYc-0004Ay-Uf for; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:07:43 -0500
Message-ID: <>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:04:12 -0400
From: Randell Jesup <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/6.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <><><><><><><><><><><><><><> <> <> <C55E752E-18FD-402C-A7DE-1627 813B3F6D> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname -
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain -
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain -
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] RTCWeb default signaling protocol [was RE: Aboutdefining a signaling protocol for WebRTC (or not)]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 20:05:12 -0000

On 9/22/2011 2:22 PM, Ravindran Parthasarathi wrote:

> OK, let's take the game example... only 2-player games would be able to
> use a simple rtcweb-SIP agent.  Anything more than 2-player would want
> to use the multi-party "conferencing" model of rtcweb, which can't even
> be signaled with SIP today as far as I can tell. (not that I've thought
> about it too much, but I can't see how it would without some changes to
> SIP)
> <partha>  In fact rtcweb client shall acts as conference un-aware client
> in the conference model and game server acts as conference server. I
> have worked in 3-party conference using SIP in the endpoint but I have
> never seen endpoint acts as conference server. So, I may be missing
> something here</partha>

I've built videophones that do in-phone 3 or 4 way conferencing (bridging
and mixing the audio and video).  It can also be done without mixing by
forwarding.  I'm unclear on if that would be possible in webrtc; is there
any way to loop around or mix audio/video from one PeerConnection to another.
(You can always turn off AEC and loop the audio... ;-)

Randell Jesup