Re: [rtcweb] No Interim on SDES at this juncture

Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com> Wed, 19 June 2013 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6577B21F9E46 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:28:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.558
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.558 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.041, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p97hu50dqzTi for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0869821F9CFA for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r5JILeaG003912 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:21:41 GMT
Received: from aserz7021.oracle.com (aserz7021.oracle.com [141.146.126.230]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5JIRvgp027865 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:27:58 GMT
Received: from abhmt114.oracle.com (abhmt114.oracle.com [141.146.116.66]) by aserz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5JIRvQ7015644; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:27:57 GMT
Received: from [10.1.21.23] (/10.5.21.23) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:27:57 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <51C02EE8.5070809@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:27:54 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BCDD0781-821C-4052-85FB-D20597D60D79@oracle.com>
References: <CA+9kkMDnjCNXGV0GU7x6gbbZMf4WiEuVvCRY8_Fix5tmdOB-Kg@mail.gmail.com> <AD220324-EEE7-4800-8512-FD7BADA9EC34@oracle.com> <CA+9kkMDY2Z_5_1uYJ1K_ZmrJB2a1-RE7V3aPqNHQg82DyagjCg@mail.gmail.com> <2975A93F-44DA-4020-B4DE-42E7ED98C08F@oracle.com> <51BAC9BC.6070708@ericsson.com> <94846970-4694-4EC8-AEFA-AEECEE0135AA@oracle.com> <51C02EE8.5070809@ericsson.com>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] No Interim on SDES at this juncture
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:28:07 -0000

On Jun 18, 2013, at 5:56 AM, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> wrote:

>>> If you want to discuss this, write a draft describing how how your 
>>> additional keying is to be integrated, what the pro and cons of it.
>>> That will enable direct discussion of a proposal. The WG clearly
>>> are opinionated on this matter, but apparently don't have energy to
>>> produce proposals.
>> 
>> There *are* drafts. 
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wing-rtcweb-sdes-problems-00 
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ohlsson-rtcweb-sdes-support-01 There
>> are even powerpoint slides, sent to the chairs the last time this
>> meeting almost happened but didn't.
> 
> One of those drafts has been expired since February I would like to
> point out.

You're just messing with me right?  You're pointing out the drafts are old, in response to a complaint the meeting's been delayed multiple times??  Might it be the drafts are old because the meeting's been delayed multiple times?!?

-hadriel