[rtcweb] Agenda time request for IETF 87 Berlin

Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com> Wed, 19 June 2013 19:23 UTC

Return-Path: <hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA4621F995C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.559
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.559 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.040, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MDtDRyJIRwOp for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AFEF21F9B8F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com []) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r5JJNUhT009458 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:23:31 GMT
Received: from userz7021.oracle.com (userz7021.oracle.com []) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5JJNT3M006285 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:23:30 GMT
Received: from abhmt107.oracle.com (abhmt107.oracle.com []) by userz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5JJNTxn006276; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:23:29 GMT
Received: from [] (/ by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:23:29 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <51C02EE8.5070809@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:23:27 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AA7C18F3-1BBC-4113-A1D3-A190FA298337@oracle.com>
References: <CA+9kkMDnjCNXGV0GU7x6gbbZMf4WiEuVvCRY8_Fix5tmdOB-Kg@mail.gmail.com> <AD220324-EEE7-4800-8512-FD7BADA9EC34@oracle.com> <CA+9kkMDY2Z_5_1uYJ1K_ZmrJB2a1-RE7V3aPqNHQg82DyagjCg@mail.gmail.com> <2975A93F-44DA-4020-B4DE-42E7ED98C08F@oracle.com> <51BAC9BC.6070708@ericsson.com> <94846970-4694-4EC8-AEFA-AEECEE0135AA@oracle.com> <51C02EE8.5070809@ericsson.com>
To: "rtcweb-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <rtcweb-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com []
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: [rtcweb] Agenda time request for IETF 87 Berlin
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:23:40 -0000

per the email below, I formally request agenda time to discuss - and reach a conclusive vote on - whether to make SDES an MTI key exchange mechanism, or not.

I plan to present both sides of the argument with a set of pro/con slides.  I used to favor making SDES mandatory, but over time I've become less sure if its benefits outweigh its drawbacks.  Mostly though what I care about is making a *decision* one way or the other, and moving on.  

I do *not* plan to present on DTLS-EKT at all, not even as a potential alternative.  I only plan to present on whether SDES should be MTI or not for WebRTC implementations.

I think this will take an hour at least, possibly longer.  I can pretend to claim it will take 15 minutes, but we all know that simply isn't true unless someone disconnects the microphones in the room.  I also expect two or more other folks to want time to present on the same topic, so it'll likely take even longer in total time.

Lastly, I beg the chairs to make this agenda item topic (not necessarily my presentation, but the general topic) the *first* agenda topic for whichever meeting session it gets put in, so that we don't run out of time on other topics and delay an SDES decision once again.


On Jun 18, 2013, at 5:56 AM, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Please request agenda time for
> Berlin and ensure to update any drafts or other material to actually
> take into account what actually has happened in the last 15 months.