Re: [rtcweb] Agenda time request for IETF 87 Berlin

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 19 June 2013 21:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05EC21F9F34 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.741
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.741 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.142, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ruytATlpexgI for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x230.google.com (mail-ie0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6F021F9F77 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id ar20so14734103iec.21 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=HHttMPQt8RMaSWUtwwsUn5ae0SH2eqHsl3EG4OWePl8=; b=DgBiylgAC4aiP7EBM/gWt7RRLgdk9PnsXEyHeJ36LnKxr6p0OkBNK/SyN/v7VKW1nv vNvfIXQLdAj8C4UNKCwA+kzvo+X8I7hG5X+31OCjPgkYKRewYWItu5bHIdH/x3cC1hX8 WG4s1Xhyfoe3/XNZikaXUiTIIkv+G4eaccBfVQLbWPdG52MZ5ioIR0TMl9GuhaZaSXQo a/dUpI77kv3KSytyrt4mGqirwEZwr413+TmdOBpX2z5Yn0r3vMHqGbCaPxquIdfYnwQC qLo6DaIpP7pOgcFoEQoOD1Yzcgka4koSG/QKdvxJnnEXL9oiBNL9MxEmwh7gjGO9t0jN v9RA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.23.8 with SMTP id i8mr11055977igf.42.1371677835454; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.49.7 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AA7C18F3-1BBC-4113-A1D3-A190FA298337@oracle.com>
References: <CA+9kkMDnjCNXGV0GU7x6gbbZMf4WiEuVvCRY8_Fix5tmdOB-Kg@mail.gmail.com> <AD220324-EEE7-4800-8512-FD7BADA9EC34@oracle.com> <CA+9kkMDY2Z_5_1uYJ1K_ZmrJB2a1-RE7V3aPqNHQg82DyagjCg@mail.gmail.com> <2975A93F-44DA-4020-B4DE-42E7ED98C08F@oracle.com> <51BAC9BC.6070708@ericsson.com> <94846970-4694-4EC8-AEFA-AEECEE0135AA@oracle.com> <51C02EE8.5070809@ericsson.com> <AA7C18F3-1BBC-4113-A1D3-A190FA298337@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:37:15 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMCVr3mHP5Vay8Ne1ON5jtbHNiEirLL+Q+N15JgdLmmh+Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0153879420ef6104df88a239
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org, "rtcweb-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <rtcweb-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Agenda time request for IETF 87 Berlin
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:37:27 -0000

Thanks for the request and for volunteering to provide input to the
discussion.  If there are others who would like to contribute to the
discussion with presentations, it would be good to let the chairs/working
group know now.

thanks,

Ted Hardie

On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Hadriel Kaplan
<hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com>wrote;wrote:

>
> Howdy,
> per the email below, I formally request agenda time to discuss - and reach
> a conclusive vote on - whether to make SDES an MTI key exchange mechanism,
> or not.
>
> I plan to present both sides of the argument with a set of pro/con slides.
>  I used to favor making SDES mandatory, but over time I've become less sure
> if its benefits outweigh its drawbacks.  Mostly though what I care about is
> making a *decision* one way or the other, and moving on.
>
> I do *not* plan to present on DTLS-EKT at all, not even as a potential
> alternative.  I only plan to present on whether SDES should be MTI or not
> for WebRTC implementations.
>
> I think this will take an hour at least, possibly longer.  I can pretend
> to claim it will take 15 minutes, but we all know that simply isn't true
> unless someone disconnects the microphones in the room.  I also expect two
> or more other folks to want time to present on the same topic, so it'll
> likely take even longer in total time.
>
> Lastly, I beg the chairs to make this agenda item topic (not necessarily
> my presentation, but the general topic) the *first* agenda topic for
> whichever meeting session it gets put in, so that we don't run out of time
> on other topics and delay an SDES decision once again.
>
> -hadriel
>
>
> On Jun 18, 2013, at 5:56 AM, Magnus Westerlund <
> magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> wrote:
> > Please request agenda time for
> > Berlin and ensure to update any drafts or other material to actually
> > take into account what actually has happened in the last 15 months.
>
>
>