Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Wed, 19 June 2013 21:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659BC21E80AC for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.030, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JpFz-83NdKuy for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:23:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qe0-f41.google.com (mail-qe0-f41.google.com [209.85.128.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D06711E80DF for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qe0-f41.google.com with SMTP id b4so3593485qen.0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=3wwaZ2MrSS+SXsa/DTynWMjdGpavHytl5JluMo0tC+s=; b=mrJbsdJM+E5Ebkfav5fgSEE8dCi23vRd6BRTlOHSK43zcgYcU8SbyTaA0aGF9iK7UP plYgEUcsh5mvyCsvWoYeUwpVOO+xB3ADNkWl+dN0Nv0YxTuuhyd/vxSfzy8Pzk70uGYe dM1xqIi2mjvt7MPj2Lp0f2X/BxRH4pKPxBfPza7YoTB+E7TCtTqFoFSbQ2t/Ke7LHf9q X4U4Jg8Py9o5RD2mBNwqmZ1SuJ56T7mj2aqwujDsKLH2AZIil72tM5Z5lzMvsqvfYtNt jldK9rFLUcbVeS5Kx/xQ2otIUXrWDLO+iqQrJyFhSoeM/A5+wJaazBNL0oH0FG1QWbDO UHoA==
X-Received: by 10.224.187.129 with SMTP id cw1mr5871723qab.68.1371676985451; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.67.65 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJrXDUEekTTxnOL1wYd62kPJZBXvRT3dfNdE_OMynGJDZM_BcQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALiegfkajJPxWZTzjYssP91VW+StStLpxoxGCkjOLKDMUWc0rA@mail.gmail.com> <51C0C1A0.9010107@nostrum.com> <CAJrXDUGqSvsosZJhcRR-kCwEX1g_wvPnSZPmmcNwggk+Z9WNCA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWfV=5xBaRqAddqUURThs9J4T4+0HK4Ux07VA51r5oC3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFNGKvWHw-yqeApEdTeuqMNPTDxvdKZ2DuzANmcR2y2CQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3AE500@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfk39prkSinDCisSqOAD8yJZuGUwLAMBabao7eHuhnAYcA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUHe=vu2695xAkg2tKvQ7J5JNqraHCpY0rKx5rDQ0xCpiA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=GbR3K0dzMkaMWu88WdNY4JWQOmDPKeNfZQNuC5d4bog@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUHG7ENOu12SkRpXOik3ArEShPHAJhtOwYyR3UaSDvQFOA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=SiPkCD6b1Z+hkgkbtT1bbxtytWyYRxH3CUGDvJOztRg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUF6uujp2jYCJgxp4kTctAFDWBBU-bWhJp4iMNDuc6A+3w@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfm_CLRBTmuJhjhrxNb5XPHGmFD9Lip37xYLVOBTxM6j_A@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUGqTGCR3reZ3=PkzQE7bhvjhyNGpdCiM-TCDnusNOxjjQ@mail.gmail.com> <51C1EE64.1010109@matthew.at> <CAJrXDUEekTTxnOL1wYd62kPJZBXvRT3dfNdE_OMynGJDZM_BcQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:22:44 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfmEjoYgC7a-Q3KFM5Ct1QFv+uH=fTcnm-Df9VZhOwXooQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlKXuhZ5nAIscrF27tL0WqXEXyCZ3YHLra/k3oqj38OTaVpYfuJFl33ldgrfCATGL1YHTI+
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:23:10 -0000

2013/6/19 Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>om>:
> With my recent proposal (NoPlan JS API), you don't have to, at least not for
> media streams.  You just tell the browser what to send with on the send
> side, and then what to receive with on the receive side.  My proposal does
> not cover transports, however.  It's an incremental improvement that
> relieves some of the pain, but not all.


Hi Peter, may you could reply to my mail about NoPlan:

  http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07871.html

:)




--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>