Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Wed, 19 June 2013 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B6B21F9E0C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.645
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.645 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hm-ykp4lKoBb for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:27:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qe0-f43.google.com (mail-qe0-f43.google.com [209.85.128.43]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5491F21F9E18 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qe0-f43.google.com with SMTP id q19so3378718qeb.2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=9eD5SnahKLeXmaTUcAPi0sWkRiIPQIPG3IAf0PdQ+5U=; b=cezkaMwvuo7OsSgfh6BBq0oGgeA+n9L8oNvGRx8U9qFLdpQh37Mn7vP7IgM0QAiMWq 4nrYUuvdA31lRiePb9RYG7Ck+WUkRZf0UxHF/uGHfXEo+rj/OlcsStbhvJWcxLA5n3cr 2Yvve0tVrkzpL6AL6yBpIgmgCP3uBptBD8lXR8p85WlenbF5QmAbaFBlzV4YC4eM/I4N LGOONxF+pxhQrnx4slOhN0r0UBz/uPO/UE2lFWPNVmFJyEw4VMBQlv99L5KdFysGL0jm vRzQWB6Zvf5wNzR/elYrO9YeeNZ35vfcmg/YqrFm/e4Bycwim5PwxCAoo+N/rbx1pkc/ 4sJA==
X-Received: by 10.224.164.205 with SMTP id f13mr4921371qay.16.1371662858454; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.67.65 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:27:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJrXDUF6uujp2jYCJgxp4kTctAFDWBBU-bWhJp4iMNDuc6A+3w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALiegfkajJPxWZTzjYssP91VW+StStLpxoxGCkjOLKDMUWc0rA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMDk2L3SBPC08WU_5RcL16-Wzv8Mocj3-Qzmxz2E24ERGg@mail.gmail.com> <51C0C1A0.9010107@nostrum.com> <CAJrXDUGqSvsosZJhcRR-kCwEX1g_wvPnSZPmmcNwggk+Z9WNCA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWfV=5xBaRqAddqUURThs9J4T4+0HK4Ux07VA51r5oC3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFNGKvWHw-yqeApEdTeuqMNPTDxvdKZ2DuzANmcR2y2CQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3AE500@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfk39prkSinDCisSqOAD8yJZuGUwLAMBabao7eHuhnAYcA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUHe=vu2695xAkg2tKvQ7J5JNqraHCpY0rKx5rDQ0xCpiA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=GbR3K0dzMkaMWu88WdNY4JWQOmDPKeNfZQNuC5d4bog@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUHG7ENOu12SkRpXOik3ArEShPHAJhtOwYyR3UaSDvQFOA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=SiPkCD6b1Z+hkgkbtT1bbxtytWyYRxH3CUGDvJOztRg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUF6uujp2jYCJgxp4kTctAFDWBBU-bWhJp4iMNDuc6A+3w@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:27:17 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfm_CLRBTmuJhjhrxNb5XPHGmFD9Lip37xYLVOBTxM6j_A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnf4BugxAnDLyx2G9slNoG5ZzPJDxBJePypU58Oe5qC2tsan/TRA7tT+vVbeJNFuxWZ8vT0
Cc: "rtcweb_ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:27:45 -0000

2013/6/19 Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>om>:
> Of course.  That's why I made a proposal that attempts to lessen the pain
> (the NoPlan JS API).  I'm trying to help you :).

And don't you agree that the pain is even less if we entirely remove SDP?

And don't you agree that after two years we don't have yet a valid SDP
model for WebRTC so it makes no sense to keep it since it helps
nothing?

:)


--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>