Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened

["Hutton, Andrew" <[e-mail]>]

Now this is getting ridiculous.

You do know that one of the goals is to build an API that web developers without knowledge of IETF protocols can use to build apps. I was only using this as an example where this has been achieved.

I also think you know that there are many apps out there already which are much more than high school projects.

I believe we are simply making life difficult by trying to do too much at once  and we need to rethink what is really needed and deliver on what we have said we we will deliver please read the charter.

Andy





On 21 Jun 2013, at 17:01, "Roman Shpount" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:


On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Hutton, Andrew <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:

Which means we have not been as unsuccessful as people seem to think.

If building a demo or a high school home work is your goal, then yes. If you want the commercial product then no. I am not sure if you are familiar with 80/20 rule, but normally 20% of features require 80% of time to implement. In case of WebRTC it is 20% of features require 99% to implement. In other words, you get something working quick, but getting it to complete product take an inordinate amount of work.
_____________
Roman Shpount