Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Wed, 19 June 2013 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51EE621F9DCD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:58:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.655
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.655 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.023, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aOCZyt+eMk9F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:58:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-x230.google.com (mail-qa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F9121F9DCA for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id cm16so542285qab.7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=P6Fsl1dp+tDgU/xrkO4MTBnxEkBtqsp19C7qViBTD0c=; b=ZndljDG+hNr1YA+8tcrm1J+FWL2HCq0WK9iCI2RlV/JSv/9ogGNjuNUceCa4QZwVPC 3B8BCnHzwKOlEXVpnVB8axkQcMP9n4cl1O76wS2IaBfr41RZNaSsK5BrDtVTjXg7uAOm 7Ze7WBM3X9q0WID0CIUqM2gLZGXQt7dj2bmgu0Q4M55dond4WcZ2uVKgZ38WdreNBaze lIxSl9leEwNnzjjDaN8lL9ernz5hj7gbDjiz0t93OzNhIVtF1Gfm8Y6Kqq+NZfsw99Bv H0P76FnnQd2FVhfsqBmeksvXWdVWdyySudjAlNugPhRGZ2RQNzwaUIRE0hv3afnbALcK /q5g==
X-Received: by 10.224.187.129 with SMTP id cw1mr4777731qab.68.1371661129907; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:58:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.67.65 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJrXDUHG7ENOu12SkRpXOik3ArEShPHAJhtOwYyR3UaSDvQFOA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALiegfkajJPxWZTzjYssP91VW+StStLpxoxGCkjOLKDMUWc0rA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMDk2L3SBPC08WU_5RcL16-Wzv8Mocj3-Qzmxz2E24ERGg@mail.gmail.com> <51C0C1A0.9010107@nostrum.com> <CAJrXDUGqSvsosZJhcRR-kCwEX1g_wvPnSZPmmcNwggk+Z9WNCA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWfV=5xBaRqAddqUURThs9J4T4+0HK4Ux07VA51r5oC3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFNGKvWHw-yqeApEdTeuqMNPTDxvdKZ2DuzANmcR2y2CQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3AE500@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfk39prkSinDCisSqOAD8yJZuGUwLAMBabao7eHuhnAYcA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUHe=vu2695xAkg2tKvQ7J5JNqraHCpY0rKx5rDQ0xCpiA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=GbR3K0dzMkaMWu88WdNY4JWQOmDPKeNfZQNuC5d4bog@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUHG7ENOu12SkRpXOik3ArEShPHAJhtOwYyR3UaSDvQFOA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:58:29 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegf=SiPkCD6b1Z+hkgkbtT1bbxtytWyYRxH3CUGDvJOztRg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlUwnusq43wFeucvLA/Sf/fpbcu913nCl4km+1oJ7je6MB0id9y8m39i0/5XF0gguYzfKt6
Cc: "rtcweb_ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:58:51 -0000

2013/6/19 Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>om>:
> But generally, anything beyond the most basic uses of the API requires at
> least some SDP hackery, and advanced uses require a lot.

Hi Peter, most of the solutions in your mail are basically based on
"blob SDP parsing/mangling/hackery". Can we agree that the current API
is a pain?:)


--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>