IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Wed, 19 June 2013 19:48 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=48823f5ea6=christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4917721F9F3F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.861
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.861 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.388, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q9u4+uHq5PRT for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5039F21F9F2B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7f4c6d000004656-68-51c20adc0961
Received: from ESESSHC001.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 1B.62.18006.CDA02C15; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:47:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.6]) by ESESSHC001.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.21]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:47:39 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>, Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened
Thread-Index: AQHObEI/LKM23biSMEicZL6ip01H1Jk7xwcAgAACKQCAAB+igIAAApYAgAB4ZYCAADHZMP//4oGAgAB39oCAACnpgIAAAi8AgAADwwCAABUmgIAAA5iAgAAH5oCAADG2IA==
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:47:39 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3B1680@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <CALiegfkajJPxWZTzjYssP91VW+StStLpxoxGCkjOLKDMUWc0rA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMDk2L3SBPC08WU_5RcL16-Wzv8Mocj3-Qzmxz2E24ERGg@mail.gmail.com> <51C0C1A0.9010107@nostrum.com> <CAJrXDUGqSvsosZJhcRR-kCwEX1g_wvPnSZPmmcNwggk+Z9WNCA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWfV=5xBaRqAddqUURThs9J4T4+0HK4Ux07VA51r5oC3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFNGKvWHw-yqeApEdTeuqMNPTDxvdKZ2DuzANmcR2y2CQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3AE500@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAJrXDUHCkQSLab2UuY_vWP3Gr8uh+++c9mDq5f4sCpuaK5aeLQ@mail.gmail.com> <51C1B907.8060508@hookflash.com> <CAJrXDUG06jvPvhfNwZ6Puzxj7E4XxELG_fU=S7B_c=tnC9eoNQ@mail.gmail.com> <78192824-A516-4376-8D4F-3B052ED47A0C@matthew.at> <CAJrXDUGOYc_Z_qWD7J0ZzVdfwYOacH_p5PjZEg5aP1LUetffMA@mail.gmail.com> <51C1F2E9.20405@hookflash.com> <51C1F5ED.9090308@matthew.at> <CAJrXDUFvL2U5jfKMvcTJ_Pi_Yj=t1LoZO7MZTJcZavuByw5b_Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJrXDUFvL2U5jfKMvcTJ_Pi_Yj=t1LoZO7MZTJcZavuByw5b_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: fi-FI
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.148]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrBLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvre4drkOBBsd2KFq0zT7CYnFt+WtW i7X/2tkdmD0WbCr1WLLkJ5PHqU6vAOYobpukxJKy4Mz0PH27BO6MPcsfMBc8Yq84vlungfEE excjJ4eEgInEndW/WCBsMYkL99azdTFycQgJHGaUeDfrBROEs4hRYtGvfqAMBwebgIVE9z9t kAYRgUCJCS+ngzUzC6hKnD90jhHEFhbwkLh/dh07SLmIgKfE8rNVIGNEBCYxSvS9ns0EUsMC VD/l1y2wI3gFfCWON09nhNjVzC5x9nsjWBEn0IJDt7+BLWAEuu77qTVMEMvEJT4cvM4McbWA xJI956FsUYmXj/+xQthKEo1LnrCCHMEsoCmxfpc+RKuixJTuh1B7BSVOznzCMoFRbBaSqbMQ OmYh6ZiFpGMBI8sqRvbcxMyc9HKjTYzAiDm45bfqDsY750QOMUpzsCiJ8348tStQSCA9sSQ1 OzW1ILUovqg0J7X4ECMTByeI4JJqYPTr6u3UusgldGCPYvHBXRG/NC5u0FgaZ1NVYuS9cV+0 bOxcw9NxSp5veHOltq88y8L7Y+HVg5stlWO9b7YsKC2v/1F4I/j+uY+PNa4eYV7RcjGrZ9Oc OvWwZR+1Kpf66mxfv3TZrfAyx18Pfxg38QSvP/LyST2beFCOtvymm6dM4g6FWnyxd1JiKc5I NNRiLipOBABbAgWGawIAAA==
Cc: "rtcweb_ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:48:01 -0000

Hi,

>>> Why aren't we using the JavaScript object model for control of components instead of serializing our control requests via SDP/whatever format and hoping that it worked?
>>>
>> That's a great question. Have you read the CU-RTCWEB proposal? Is it any closer to what you imagined the RTCWEB API might be?
>
> My "NoPlan JS API" proposal also allows control of components without serialize control via a format, if the JS chooses to do so (SDP is still there if JS wants).  It only does so for media streams, not for transports, but it allows incremental improvement to the API.

So, IF we decide to remove SDP and Offer/Answer, we'll end up arguing about "Plan C(U) vs No Plan"? :)

Regards,

Christer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email