Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened

Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> Wed, 19 June 2013 05:37 UTC

Return-Path: <pthatcher@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8107221F9D7B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.846
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.846 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.131, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id frODjFNn3fPc for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x230.google.com (mail-pa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F095921F9D62 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id kp12so4743713pab.7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=YfEOzRP/WUCxhQgSB8mOk6LIJJaq4h217mIeZCyt1VY=; b=dO1YdB65lQEGsjKhizxyh94mViz8+5cf4J5MRNxYATmQ/Tsw3IcY8U6nszgP6x5nhp piP4aLaxjzItAMMnH1158s3UzUusuP7vqgsFZyYuj389KHOtR8xrLn1pJHi+cFrTlF+y TjRsThrQWI1e25eCPIzxgJbZE0KZGtTHdVjj+NWcnwJwo5LlHkr4WUlmGsAxyya4tsbt Jd8uVmxzIqoRx+G+FwW1Y8IwZkueAgKlAJtdnn2NNXtbozqPkriGsCI4k2zClISva64Z EzAHxZn7vD05Hrj1GfRN5CrJ86QLcxHJ/pubIaOX/1vljykvvgmDdyNMmEsJG0Pq+H7A Mr9A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=YfEOzRP/WUCxhQgSB8mOk6LIJJaq4h217mIeZCyt1VY=; b=PMHegpybP7RKL6yxd+YM5pI3ieLXqV2AXVi6HCAAGQdXH5jk54cbD4SMsq7cUStEQL nCIzwmhQJaXoYMojr86IR8AxLDwLrSkS59hvIRLqOWKIsmXiUmPfh3bIjQssx6M0Yi83 wMEa2TP+9NQj393HONAXkPeiMnAhnti1b7mhZ7xmTR1QGeaVXwIJ+Lly1nCV6nRF4G8P h73bo8jYwIzmEoeT+WJcbmvU4ljyry36PZ2XemZC1zDqE7//LLpD6DkvkF0+kvSgEYwQ pEeg/R3+pwMlw60JOywv3EgU7EplYm7JmeTYwS6bsfbt/dV+oWviK2YO1FHO/sxr8jVD t8aA==
X-Received: by 10.66.83.7 with SMTP id m7mr5209512pay.150.1371620219593; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.66.88.8 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:36:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnWfV=5xBaRqAddqUURThs9J4T4+0HK4Ux07VA51r5oC3Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALiegfkajJPxWZTzjYssP91VW+StStLpxoxGCkjOLKDMUWc0rA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMDk2L3SBPC08WU_5RcL16-Wzv8Mocj3-Qzmxz2E24ERGg@mail.gmail.com> <51C0C1A0.9010107@nostrum.com> <CAJrXDUGqSvsosZJhcRR-kCwEX1g_wvPnSZPmmcNwggk+Z9WNCA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWfV=5xBaRqAddqUURThs9J4T4+0HK4Ux07VA51r5oC3Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:36:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUFNGKvWHw-yqeApEdTeuqMNPTDxvdKZ2DuzANmcR2y2CQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d042ef48df4cbad04df7b37f6
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlHBktt0D/3C+1+Jk8UDU/q7/yDoijUxlSednbIj1nDM1nOrXTHBXryKTRBT2dJ28TvUwrWLc24t8Kyo5NW+PG0ShnEJcEF7xqHU63tBAzFxU3EgwVsiA09k+usuNa3R0SbLCO8uWBWLL2vFGgkX1pJG3hJ8k/UfTKjVBIOaNZ4e4LU5+wwOfnrtIxUMe6GUOFDV+Q+
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:37:00 -0000

Martin, you're right; that was overly harsh of me.  Adam, I apologize.
 I'll be civil in the future.


On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote;wrote:

> I agree with Peter, except for this bit:
>
> On 18 June 2013 15:16, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> wrote:
> > Adam, I think you're confused.
>
> Adam is much harder to confuse than you think, or than he professes.
>
> Speaking of burning it all down and starting over.  If you want a
> house-related analogy, that's not quite correct.  It's refusing to
> build an extension because the old house, while legally fit for
> habitation, is falling down around your ears.  Since you only need
> foundations, it's not that big a job (though I'll grant you that it's
> bigger than many people realize, even with that smaller scope).
>