IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Thu, 20 June 2013 04:56 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=88837ccfb6=christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B5021F9BDB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.841
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.841 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.408, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K6b43qory8i3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw1.ericsson.se (mailgw1.ericsson.se [193.180.251.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978C221F9BEE for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7f5d6d000003d54-19-51c28b5f2d7b
Received: from ESESSHC003.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw1.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id A4.81.15700.F5B82C15; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:55:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.6]) by ESESSHC003.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.27]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:55:59 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened
Thread-Index: AQHObEI/LKM23biSMEicZL6ip01H1Jk7xwcAgAACKQCAAB+igIAAApYAgAB4ZYCAADHZMP//4oGAgAB39oCAACnpgIAAAi8AgAADwwCAABUmgIAAA5iAgAAH5oCAADG2IP//4A+AgAC5dzA=
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:55:59 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3B1A1C@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <CALiegfkajJPxWZTzjYssP91VW+StStLpxoxGCkjOLKDMUWc0rA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMDk2L3SBPC08WU_5RcL16-Wzv8Mocj3-Qzmxz2E24ERGg@mail.gmail.com> <51C0C1A0.9010107@nostrum.com> <CAJrXDUGqSvsosZJhcRR-kCwEX1g_wvPnSZPmmcNwggk+Z9WNCA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWfV=5xBaRqAddqUURThs9J4T4+0HK4Ux07VA51r5oC3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFNGKvWHw-yqeApEdTeuqMNPTDxvdKZ2DuzANmcR2y2CQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3AE500@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAJrXDUHCkQSLab2UuY_vWP3Gr8uh+++c9mDq5f4sCpuaK5aeLQ@mail.gmail.com> <51C1B907.8060508@hookflash.com> <CAJrXDUG06jvPvhfNwZ6Puzxj7E4XxELG_fU=S7B_c=tnC9eoNQ@mail.gmail.com> <78192824-A516-4376-8D4F-3B052ED47A0C@matthew.at> <CAJrXDUGOYc_Z_qWD7J0ZzVdfwYOacH_p5PjZEg5aP1LUetffMA@mail.gmail.com> <51C1F2E9.20405@hookflash.com> <51C1F5ED.9090308@matthew.at> <CAJrXDUFvL2U5jfKMvcTJ_Pi_Yj=t1LoZO7MZTJcZavuByw5b_Q@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3B1680@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAJrXDUGZ=M4SsSCYLUjs36C7JcbRPj2jhreKJgqH51YR_8oc-Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJrXDUGZ=M4SsSCYLUjs36C7JcbRPj2jhreKJgqH51YR_8oc-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.17]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrBLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvrW5896FAg+WzdS3aZh9hsbi2/DWr xdp/7ewOzB4LNpV6LFnyk8njVKdXAHMUt01SYklZcGZ6nr5dAnfGhTN/WAuauCtaPh9mbmC8 w9XFyMkhIWAi8fZAExOELSZx4d56ti5GLg4hgcOMEk9+XGeHcBYxSkzYcR7I4eBgE7CQ6P6n DdIgIqApMXlyMyuIzSzgLfHkzm52EFtYwEPi9rO9LCDlIgKeEsvPVoGMERGYxyix8uxfZpAa FgFViVm9nSwgNq+Ar8SH958YIXb1cUjc2zCbDSTBKRAocWniHbDrGIGu+35qDRPEMnGJW0/m Q10tILFkz3lmCFtU4uXjf6wgiyUEFCWW98uBmMxAd67fpQ/RqSgxpfshO8RaQYmTM5+wTGAU m4Vk6CyEjllIOmYh6VjAyLKKkT03MTMnvdxwEyMwYg5u+a27g/HUOZFDjNIcLErivB9O7QoU EkhPLEnNTk0tSC2KLyrNSS0+xMjEwQkiuKQaGLm7Ly56JG/yWaAxY/Ym2aYPD+sy/8yWaXNr OPCYYXI3g/JpJUEmCdbsYmX7mhnNDyZcrPRkE0z7ejskf0J1JO+B79/mrgu79fmemDnTx7VN U+KN5vmwZbBWyRycvV/KvKG2vMHsw9b2Ce3+znJ3nSsFPS97Luq5Ljg1M8kj6Mm6j71lcvvW KrEUZyQaajEXFScCAMtguEtrAgAA
Cc: "rtcweb_ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:56:07 -0000

Hi,

>>>> Why aren't we using the JavaScript object model for control of components instead of serializing our control requests via SDP/whatever format and hoping that it worked?
>>>>
>>> That's a great question. Have you read the CU-RTCWEB proposal? Is it any closer to what you imagined the RTCWEB API might be?
>>>
>>> My "NoPlan JS API" proposal also allows control of components without serialize control via a format, if the JS chooses to 
>>> do so (SDP is still there if JS wants).  It only does so for media streams, not for transports, but it allows incremental improvement to the API.
>> So, IF we decide to remove SDP and Offer/Answer, we'll end up arguing about "Plan C(U) vs No Plan"? :)
>
> I think we already are :).

At the virtual interim, the Plan A and Plan B folks were asked to sit down and try to come up with a compromise "Plan AB" solution.

I guess it would be good if people that don't want SDP could try to come up with a compromise "CU No Plan" solution :)

Regards,

Christer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email