Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested from routing community
Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Thu, 07 February 2013 16:22 UTC
Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4174921F86FB for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 08:22:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mSpVPbGGDV3u for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 08:22:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22a.google.com (mail-ie0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A810121F86D8 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 08:22:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id c11so3758091ieb.15 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 08:22:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+1kTqLBYtBl2wP96nBoshDlJxKtWOrWRxnQ6493LAK8=; b=tAxltYW6sKyqD4NKlhDEmjXBTRGnkRAZ2UeVbF3Nd47z448k8sXS0gL/jGC3V/uU1s NqBqQzFsC1GqWYW9uJfOV8Jdx7mCuOk+bBC0f9MC/lDKVTRE+sbRVgxHHRMw3wUZuO22 5Sw4uXAUXLOPwrEmYqnUsVX5mKoVVzDK607nayDXhkeAbkeShsbAUuTJdrIEGIDMukL4 RPsAdBjDHbpVQmUPatC6MD1n4euwYVGsIx+6pvSSePGJToYkjBTAfVwOilBP05k0WMbl FzeamXswoPBHymg+72r6eRkJIG1LGwmE96qaQZ+G5Rs8+gxoVtG7efAM9y+PmxsXUhbo O8rw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.153.198 with SMTP id vi6mr15680635igb.112.1360254135699; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 08:22:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.34.203 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 08:22:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <021A2E07-50AF-443C-AC4A-E61A28D57F6F@tony.li>
References: <201302061841.r16IfBn5084352@gateway1.orleans.occnc.com> <72B40FF5-6A29-4857-93AA-768490A20903@juniper.net> <021A2E07-50AF-443C-AC4A-E61A28D57F6F@tony.li>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:22:15 -0500
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rfkiLQjSpopXN4KwUywuBam7h0zqo616dYA1SPOfOXGFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested from routing community
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8f22c68190087f04d524d86a"
Cc: Shankar Raman M J <mjsraman@gmail.com>, rtgwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 16:22:27 -0000
There are two different aspects to power-aware routing that I think are of interest. The first is developing a framework and method for evaluating different possible solutions. We had a discussion of draft-retana-rtgwg-eacp-00 in RTGWG in July 2012. The second is examining and considering control plane and routing solutions in that context. That seems to me to be more likely something for the IRTF, rather than the IETF. The former, however, is where I think that the IETF's operational knowledge and experience could be useful in framing what would be a useful solution. Would it be possible to discuss this work that Balaji is presenting in that context? In other words, if the goal of the solution is X,Y, and Z, then this mechanism seems useful/ not useful, has stability concerns, etc. And then there are the questions about assumptions and goals... All of this is great to discuss in RTGWG - there's been significant interest, but what is mature enough for the IETF vs. the IRTF and whether there are sufficient people to work in the area is not clear. Alia On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> wrote: > > On Feb 7, 2013, at 5:07 AM, Hannes Gredler <hannes@juniper.net> wrote: > > > Do you think that optimizing a part of the network which gives only > limited > > overall savings is a worthwhile goal ? > > > Hannes, > > I'll just point out that this argument that you and Eric are espousing is > skirting dangerously close to the quagmire of business. And we know from > long experience that the IETF does not do business models. > > I'd like to strongly suggest that we simply restrict ourselves to the goal > of saving power. I think that we can agree, in general, that saving power > is a worthwhile goal. As to whether or not it is significant or makes > economic sense is very much an issue that should be left to the operator > community to decide. Limited overall savings may be worthwhile in one > context and pointless in another. > > I know of one country where they are purportedly mandating power > reductions. In such situations, saving that last watt is the difference > between a fine and not. On the other hand, in a situation where power is > very cheap, it's obviously silly. > > Let's not argue about the marginal value of energy. That's a business > model issue. Let's talk about how technology can actually save power. > > Regards, > Tony > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > rtgwg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg >
- Power aware networks : Comments requested from ro… Balaji venkat Venkataswami
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Balaji venkat Venkataswami
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Curtis Villamizar
- RE: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Eric Osborne (eosborne)
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Balaji Venkat
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Balaji Venkat
- RE: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Eric Osborne (eosborne)
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Balaji Venkat
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Tony Li
- RE: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Mingui Zhang
- Fwd: Power aware networks : Comments requested fr… Balaji venkat Venkataswami
- Fwd: Power aware networks : Comments requested fr… Balaji venkat Venkataswami
- Fwd: Power aware networks : Comments requested fr… Balaji venkat Venkataswami
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Hannes Gredler
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Balaji venkat Venkataswami
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Acee Lindem
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Balaji venkat Venkataswami
- RE: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Eric Osborne (eosborne)
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Shankar Raman
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Balaji venkat Venkataswami
- RE: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Eric Osborne (eosborne)
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Tony Li
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Balaji venkat Venkataswami
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Alia Atlas
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Balaji venkat Venkataswami
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Tony Li
- PANET side-meeting Mingui Zhang
- GreenTE discussion Mingui Zhang
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Hannes Gredler
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Tony Li
- RE: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Mingui Zhang
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Hannes Gredler
- RE: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Mingui Zhang
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Balaji venkat Venkataswami
- RE: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… John E Drake
- RE: PANET side-meeting Eric Osborne (eosborne)
- Re: PANET side-meeting Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- RE: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Fedyk, Donald (Don)
- Re: PANET side-meeting Curtis Villamizar
- Re: PANET side-meeting Tony Li
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Curtis Villamizar
- RE: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… John E Drake
- RE: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… John E Drake
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Tony Li
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Tony Li
- RE: PANET side-meeting Mingui Zhang
- Re: PANET side-meeting Curtis Villamizar
- RE: PANET side-meeting Fedyk, Donald (Don)
- Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested fro… Thomas Nadeau
- RE: PANET side-meeting Mingui Zhang
- PANET drafts (was Re: PANET side-meeting) Curtis Villamizar
- RE: PANET side-meeting Susan Hares