Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Thu, 13 February 2020 14:51 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8DBA1201E3 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 06:51:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wTDMXMiK5tNH for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 06:51:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FCD012022C for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 06:51:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:40958) by ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.139]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1j2FpV-000isF-R3 (Exim 4.92.3) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 14:51:01 +0000
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 14:51:01 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, saag@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20200212002125.GO18021@localhost>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2002131443470.25433@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <157762745765.1150.7880025422884493076@ietfa.amsl.com> <2C5DFA70-AD0E-4139-B28E-2D4EDB6E5409@sinodun.com> <46BDE9EB-6306-4194-AFFA-7E9E6604765F@sinodun.com> <825b8c8e-7ee9-9276-d09e-9c006acf3804@ericsson.com> <CABcZeBOzJ2MRS8deZqN+e-o9tFDwgSrYK3_hmV-0pfO+L9oaVw@mail.gmail.com> <53c87d6b-cad1-3a80-291d-e2a896705da5@ericsson.com> <CABcZeBNJWmFTV==6sa0qnAPyRr4=6OiCacchzobE=RozHnqPdg@mail.gmail.com> <7901248e-c7dd-8a12-65df-f40415fde5e2@cs.tcd.ie> <26497.1581418516@dooku> <20200212002125.GO18021@localhost>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/jlVNCTQxyhLRjBLYLl9V0Wk_UKI>
Subject: Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 14:51:16 -0000

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:
>
> Can we move past domainnames?  Maybe.  What is realistic?
>
> One possibility is to do everything via smartphone apps, with app store
> operators acting as curators.  Naming would still be about (trade)marks
> (including icons, at least for those who are not sight-impaired), but we
> might get past domainnames.  Who wants such a world?

When I wonder about this kind of thing, I try to think about the
practicalities: would the OS vendors want to run registries for hundreds
of millions of names themselves, or would they prefer to outsource it?
Would the setup be something like certification authorities? How would the
namespace relate to the market structure: would they be parallel like the
DNS, or unrelated like WebPKI? Would we end up with something like the
CA/B forum, except also responsible for the top-level of the namespace,
and thus effectively performing the same function as ICANN?

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Hebrides, Bailey, Fair Isle, Faeroes: Cyclonic 5 to 7, becoming south or
southeast 7 to severe gale 9, occasionally storm 10 later in Bailey and
Faeroes. Rough or very rough, becoming very rough or high and very high later
in Bailey. Wintry showers, rain later. Mainly good, becoming moderate or poor
later.