IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sframe] Concluding SFRAME

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Thu, 06 October 2022 12:41 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C542C1524D0 for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Oct 2022 05:41:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xtRq-_UAz_Vf for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Oct 2022 05:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com (mail-lf1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AE79C1524BB for <sframe@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Oct 2022 05:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id d6so2487095lfs.10 for <sframe@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 Oct 2022 05:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=nVBRwsatjPuQ+LC/hYlBnFfmvhO/YlGSyqreTBPdtWg=; b=jIZkKL/9YQU/M9Qyb8UTvLpoQOAdTNQg/TcAdJPYVfafi+mY8q7tTO6xaqAYxyEF0j EX25nF5+3jZqIktmicwAvXFB8YHjjgUpnZakF004hfH5GFCNxTn6lElDe0JqLmTBMNkx RHgH8h2zAy486pcgXzmNlRE1deNyjligHuug3+Dbp1kMR9EEUsy/EO+sXv/TyFfVoNsV frf49b/O8GbHQQuE0/YnrdKXa+0wvcULV3ugLk3xSBFFEVyi0Wa0n+62D90vuCtGlaw1 6+rWFHGi6zaZcMbouVystrrHP5BJRZzC13vFCRzqkyd/bXUNz4OxfnUU/46dQUqUC6kT 0aRg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=nVBRwsatjPuQ+LC/hYlBnFfmvhO/YlGSyqreTBPdtWg=; b=R6ZQQZ5N8TCWLzyxu2iR8Mo7v7yiOcLrV5E3CULJQC121Xw5MmIR1vN5FwcBP6VuBI KSfTiW7+qSgZoG5MeLmZasemVCT44PQKI2xjAQfULAyCRzdwb3/ElK/t4oZ9P1bwFZFj tjowhjDQTNfE+tgaoiq5xhktYJMUZpPYCpnEX+Q75sV8lgD2qQUEfukCaqbS6IDa+UDh QaNmTY94/wyxJpUSpZIur9A1tUYLh0Xl2kXqI9RDpxuzaiWDIIOLeAoF/yLEFr2MX3nQ waq82txalTsjFhp72UoyjiWASJI3lJbMefd9gTm+qiBu2gaNe7x8TsrChbfI65Wsq/Gs NMbg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0XJA3eNYMCViqX+HTGwvFHS9FrlcPrdZCbItkdemvOLOWKbRwS P09ByKHF9Af3A1OHyuq+r+T21fxIEfL+k5CR+zPcxw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5eYFEDKGtejCz/l/+H2/TVD1cmiiQ27ExkylSmNrsAdKuEMNCU7daIL0GevzfLyP2Tiwuwuqi8SHgo8aV8gwE=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:2354:b0:4a2:5004:5216 with SMTP id p20-20020a056512235400b004a250045216mr1734641lfu.481.1665060086475; Thu, 06 Oct 2022 05:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwYJz930r+P=5bO8UZYHYuBDuW69MwWCE67BEQTOFnXw4g@mail.gmail.com> <BYAPR06MB4037B9AD4403A8ECA6FB090291979@BYAPR06MB4037.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <81CC8365-A73B-4E06-BB4F-0846E721B675@apple.com> <CAL0qLwa8UMYanaK70etDAs33yFMGn7Pd85mWAFw0mZKumR7iQQ@mail.gmail.com> <7D9F832D-E20D-42D4-B503-A18AA238CBA2@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <7D9F832D-E20D-42D4-B503-A18AA238CBA2@apple.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2022 08:41:15 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgSx5pXBFwMp1Cs-0h_iHEDMFpsXfv0sLF+JPZyFDZCPhA@mail.gmail.com>
To: youenn fablet <yfablet=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Youenn Fablet <youenn@apple.com>, "Sergio Murillo (CosmoSoftware)" <sergio.garcia.murillo@cosmosoftware.io>, "sframe@ietf.org" <sframe@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fc018605ea5d0208"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sframe/AkJN5UpSuxby_rgWM8n5OoAYMYo>
Subject: Re: [Sframe] Concluding SFRAME
X-BeenThere: sframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Media Frames <sframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sframe/>
List-Post: <mailto:sframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2022 12:41:32 -0000

+1

I believe the IETF MLS WG receives a weekly summary of GitHub activity.
Chairs, can you set this up?

On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 6:02 AM youenn fablet <yfablet=
40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hi Murray,
>
> Following on this discussion, you might have noticed active progress on
> the SFrame GitHub repository although there is no live discussion on the
> mailing list.
> Editors plan to push for a new WD version (probably the current GitHub
> ToT) with improvements and clarifications in the next couple of weeks.
>
> I am wondering whether it would be useful for this mailing list to be
> notified of what happens on the SFrame GitHub repository.
> The WebRTC WG mailing list is doing this (see
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2022Sep/0099.html for
> a new issue example or
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2022Sep/0091.html for
> a weekly summary).
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Y
>
> On 27 Jul 2022, at 17:37, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 11:11 AM Youenn Fablet <youenn@apple.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 to what Sergio said.
>>
>> Also, there has been some progress on GitHub, admittedly very slow, to
>> be able to finalise the first WG draft.
>> The latest commit was made 5 days ago.
>> I would expect a first WG draft to happen before the end of this summer.
>>
>
> Youenn,
>
> The change made five days ago appears to be a merge of a bunch of
> automated and other miscellaneous metadata changes, not draft development.
> The last change to the actual draft work I can see was in March, matching
> the last time there was any non-automatic list traffic.
>
> What I don't see much evidence of is that there's likely to be sustained
> working group energy should this draft appear by the end of the summer.
> The working group was chartered in November of 2020 but hasn't adopted
> anything yet.  I believe the chairs are feeling deflated, and I sympathize.
>
> Do you believe we're going to see an active working group here in the near
> future?
>
> -MSK
> --
> Sframe mailing list
> Sframe@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe
>
>
> --
> Sframe mailing list
> Sframe@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email