Re: [sidr] WG adoption poll for draft-huston-rpki-validation-01

I'm not yet convinced that the operational costs justify the potential 
weakening of security.  So I do not support adoption of the document as 
is.  I would like to see it split into 2 drafts  -- one describing the 
problem(s) (perhaps including the aspects Rob has mentioned) with an 
analysis of their likely frequency/impact/cost; and then if the WG 
agrees one is needed, a separate draft for a solution that would include 
an assessment of any reduction in security that results from using this 
solution.  Perhaps there are solutions that don't require modifying the 
RPKI validation. I'm willing to review the resulting drafts.

On 4/25/14 12:05 PM, Sandra Murphy wrote:
> The authors of draft-huston-rpki-validation-01.txt, RPKI Validation Reconsidered, have requested wg adoption.
>
> See http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-huston-rpki-validation-01.
>
> Please do respond to the list as to whether you support the wg adopting this as a work item.  You do not need to comment on the content of this draft at this time.  You are asked to indicate if you think that this is work that the wg should be doing and whether this draft is an acceptable starting point.  Adding whether you can/will review or not is useful.
>
> Note that active support is required for adoption.  Silence is a vote against adoption.
>
> This adoption call will end on 9 May 2014.
>
> --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>