Re: [sidr] WG adoption poll for draft-huston-rpki-validation-01

I would like to see the WG discuss validation. I think there are inherent
risks in the current model, which could be avoided if we had a more nuanced
understanding of the validity of any given resource under consideration.

So as a co-author of this draft its hardly surprising I support adoption,
because I want us to have a real conversation.

-George, speaking as co-author of the draft.

On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 2:05 AM, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> wrote:

> The authors of draft-huston-rpki-validation-01.txt, RPKI Validation
> Reconsidered, have requested wg adoption.
>
> See http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-huston-rpki-validation-01.
>
> Please do respond to the list as to whether you support the wg adopting
> this as a work item.  You do not need to comment on the content of this
> draft at this time.  You are asked to indicate if you think that this is
> work that the wg should be doing and whether this draft is an acceptable
> starting point.  Adding whether you can/will review or not is useful.
>
> Note that active support is required for adoption.  Silence is a vote
> against adoption.
>
> This adoption call will end on 9 May 2014.
>
> --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>