Re: [sidr] WG adoption poll for draft-huston-rpki-validation-01

Obviously, I also support this call for adoption, for the reasons George has outlined here.

   Geoff

On 29 Apr 2014, at 10:11 am, George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> wrote:

> I would like to see the WG discuss validation. I think there are inherent risks in the current model, which could be avoided if we had a more nuanced understanding of the validity of any given resource under consideration.
> 
> So as a co-author of this draft its hardly surprising I support adoption, because I want us to have a real conversation.
> 
> -George, speaking as co-author of the draft.
> 
> 
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 2:05 AM, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> wrote:
> The authors of draft-huston-rpki-validation-01.txt, RPKI Validation Reconsidered, have requested wg adoption.
> 
> See http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-huston-rpki-validation-01.
> 
> Please do respond to the list as to whether you support the wg adopting this as a work item.  You do not need to comment on the content of this draft at this time.  You are asked to indicate if you think that this is work that the wg should be doing and whether this draft is an acceptable starting point.  Adding whether you can/will review or not is useful.
> 
> Note that active support is required for adoption.  Silence is a vote against adoption.
> 
> This adoption call will end on 9 May 2014.
> 
> --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr