IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] WG adoption poll for draft-huston-rpki-validation-01

"Sriram, Kotikalapudi" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov> Tue, 29 April 2014 17:01 UTC

Return-Path: <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085B41A04B6 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 10:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UTSrnsFaSjBI for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 10:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1blp0181.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.181]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E89031A0290 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 10:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLUPR09MB104.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.255.212.24) by BLUPR09MB102.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.255.212.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.929.12; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:01:34 +0000
Received: from BLUPR09MB104.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.212.24]) by BLUPR09MB104.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.212.24]) with mapi id 15.00.0929.001; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:01:34 +0000
From: "Sriram, Kotikalapudi" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
To: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sidr] WG adoption poll for draft-huston-rpki-validation-01
Thread-Index: AQHPYKBEpLgk+3/RrE24/zivQICaFpso1J3g
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:01:33 +0000
Message-ID: <dfad69adddbf42f2884e8f02474f49a2@BLUPR09MB104.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BBA7CCE4-1A6C-4D06-A5DC-54B93A1D2202@tislabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <BBA7CCE4-1A6C-4D06-A5DC-54B93A1D2202@tislabs.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [129.6.140.100]
x-forefront-prvs: 0196A226D1
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009001)(6009001)(428001)(13464003)(377454003)(51704005)(189002)(199002)(81342001)(81542001)(79102001)(99286001)(80976001)(561944002)(19580395003)(15975445006)(50986999)(20776003)(83322001)(76176999)(77982001)(54356999)(33646001)(77096999)(19580405001)(4396001)(99396002)(74662001)(31966008)(76482001)(46102001)(86362001)(92566001)(80022001)(101416001)(66066001)(87936001)(15202345003)(76576001)(2656002)(74316001)(74502001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR09MB102; H:BLUPR09MB104.namprd09.prod.outlook.com; FPR:ECDCF9B1.ACF64C26.7ADB3F07.8CE651F9.20233; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (: nist.gov does not designate permitted sender hosts)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nist.gov
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/pCUC-9rDVR6WjMufv2t8ty9e4F4
Subject: Re: [sidr] WG adoption poll for draft-huston-rpki-validation-01
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:01:42 -0000

I have read the draft, and offered extensive comments and discussed the contents
with the authors on this list.

I support adoption as a WG document, but would like to see 
more discussion to further clarify the proposal and its pros/cons.

Sriram

>-----Original Message-----
>From: sidr [mailto:sidr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sandra Murphy
>Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 12:05 PM
>To: sidr@ietf.org
>Cc: Sandra Murphy
>Subject: [sidr] WG adoption poll for draft-huston-rpki-validation-01
>
>The authors of draft-huston-rpki-validation-01.txt, RPKI Validation
>Reconsidered, have requested wg adoption.
>
>See http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-huston-rpki-validation-01.
>
>Please do respond to the list as to whether you support the wg adopting this as
>a work item.  You do not need to comment on the content of this draft at this
>time.  You are asked to indicate if you think that this is work that the wg should
>be doing and whether this draft is an acceptable starting point.  Adding whether
>you can/will review or not is useful.
>
>Note that active support is required for adoption.  Silence is a vote against
>adoption.
>
>This adoption call will end on 9 May 2014.
>
>--Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
>_______________________________________________
>sidr mailing list
>sidr@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email