IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] WG adoption poll for draft-huston-rpki-validation-01

Andy Newton <andy@arin.net> Mon, 28 April 2014 20:15 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@arin.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6CB1A6FA8 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:15:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3f4t86CjGAbP for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:14:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.arin.net (smtp2.arin.net [IPv6:2001:500:4:13::32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B78C1A03FC for <sidr@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:14:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by smtp2.arin.net (Postfix, from userid 323) id B1D5221363F; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:14:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from CHAXCH06.corp.arin.net (chaxch06.corp.arin.net [192.149.252.95]) by smtp2.arin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3307D213683; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:14:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from CHAXCH04.corp.arin.net (10.1.30.19) by CHAXCH06.corp.arin.net (192.149.252.95) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.342.3; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:14:58 -0400
Received: from CHAXCH02.corp.arin.net ([169.254.2.7]) by CHAXCH04.corp.arin.net ([10.1.30.19]) with mapi id 14.02.0347.000; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:14:57 -0400
From: Andy Newton <andy@arin.net>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Thread-Topic: [sidr] WG adoption poll for draft-huston-rpki-validation-01
Thread-Index: AQHPYKA/BuQnGyTcK0qX/VzTcqgRlZsi9McAgATKE4A=
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:14:57 +0000
Message-ID: <B7457221-E03B-4D8C-86AA-3DD9A599D27E@arin.net>
References: <BBA7CCE4-1A6C-4D06-A5DC-54B93A1D2202@tislabs.com> <m2k3ad5iv3.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2k3ad5iv3.wl%randy@psg.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.1.30.37]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <A0982B9555A8064288DA1E4FE8A27A1D@corp.arin.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/Ddpr8wypYJaJH6lNy5-C9mPewLk
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WG adoption poll for draft-huston-rpki-validation-01
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:15:02 -0000

I support the adoption of this draft, as it makes the operations of a CA less problematic.

I also 100% disagree with Randy’s view that it adds complexity. To the contrary, it lessens complexity, aids flexibility and decreases fragility.

-andy

On Apr 25, 2014, at 3:06 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

> i really hate to side with dr kent :)
> 
> i am unsure of this is a useful work item.  please explain how it is
> other than a complex (i.e. dangerous) patch to accommodate sloppy
> operational praactices by a CA.  
> 
> make the protocol complex and you are vulnerable forever.  sloppy CA
> ops practices can always be remedied.  so which is the worse problem?
> 
> randy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email