Re: [sipcore] Proposal: Call for adoption & WGLC: draft-roach-sipcore-priority-00

Hi,

I support the adoption.

As I have indicated before, I think there should be some kind of template for the registration.

Regards,

Christer

________________________________________
From: sipcore-bounces@ietf.org [sipcore-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Paul Kyzivat [pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu]
Sent: Monday, 12 November 2012 10:49 PM
To: SIPCORE; sipcore-ads@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [sipcore] Proposal: Call for adoption & WGLC:  draft-roach-sipcore-priority-00

PLEASE RESPOND TO THIS MESSAGE

This is a request to the sipcore wg to adopt the new individual draft
draft-roach-sipcore-priority-00, and a start of WGLC on that document,
to end on Sunday, November 25, 2012. (This is a trivial doc to review,
but people may be slow getting back to work after the meeting and there
is a holiday coming in the US, so I'm giving more time than I otherwise
would.)

The reason for this is that the ecrit wg wants to define a new value for
the Priority header field. RFC 3261 defines that header field and an
initial set of values. It also mentions the possibility of extension.
But it failed to establish an IANA registry for that purpose, and didn't
otherwise define a process for extension.

The intro to *this* document explains its purpose:

    This document defines a new IANA registry to keep track of the values
    defined for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) "Priority" header
    field.  This header field was defined in [RFC3261], section 20.26.
    It was clearly specified in a way that allows for the creation of new
    values beyond those originally specified; however, no registry has
    been established for it.

Once that is done, ecrit will be able to make their extension in accord
with the registration procedures that have been defined. The
registration policy is "IETF Review", so discussion of the merits of
that new value can be discussed as part of the review of *that*
document: draft-ietf-ecrit-psap-callback.

REQUESTED ACTIONS:

- indicate (ASAP) willingness, or not, for the sipcore wg to work on
   this problem, and adopt this draft as the basis for that work.

- provide any comments you have on this document before the end of
   the WGLC period (Friday, November 25.)

        Thanks,
        Paul
_______________________________________________
sipcore mailing list
sipcore@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore