Re: [sipcore] consensus call: draft-roach-sipcore-priority-00: IANA registration template needed?

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Thu, 29 November 2012 07:33 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B822821F8A58 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 23:33:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.102
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.102 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.147, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o49qxnHzWCv4 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 23:33:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw7.ericsson.se (mailgw7.ericsson.se [193.180.251.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27AC21F85CE for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 23:33:09 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-b7f936d0000018b3-47-50b70fb31e9b
Received: from esessmw0191.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw7.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 63.65.06323.3BF07B05; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 08:33:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSHC021.ericsson.se (153.88.183.81) by esessmw0191.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.84) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.279.1; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 08:33:07 +0100
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.119]) by ESESSHC021.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.81]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 08:33:07 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, "sipcore@ietf.org" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sipcore] consensus call: draft-roach-sipcore-priority-00: IANA registration template needed?
Thread-Index: AQHNzbbBe6sci1iEWUqAvhw1W5u4NZgAadkw
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 07:33:07 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B048D89@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <50A160D8.8030602@alum.mit.edu> <50B68A43.8040605@alum.mit.edu> <50B68E74.3060307@alum.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <50B68E74.3060307@alum.mit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.16]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrJLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje4W/u0BBj0X2S1WbDjAavH1xyY2 ByaPv+8/MHksWfKTKYApissmJTUnsyy1SN8ugSvj/rvv7AWdghXnPk1gaWDczNvFyMkhIWAi 8WbNK1YIW0ziwr31bF2MXBxCAicZJda8m88M4exklJj/rpsdwlnCKDGp+QBTFyMHB5uAhUT3 P22QbhGBQImrSyYwg9jCAjkSy1v72CDiuRL9Lx6zQNhGEuf7GsBqWARUJZbOWgVm8wp4SzRe 3wV2hRBQ/ZmLs8HinAI6EmumHwOzGYGu+35qDROIzSwgLnHryXwmiKsFJJbsOc8MYYtKvHz8 D+obRYmdZ9uZIep1JBbs/sQGYWtLLFv4GmqvoMTJmU9YIPZqS7QsnsA+gVF8FpIVs5C0z0LS PgtJ+wJGllWM7LmJmTnp5eabGIHRc3DLb4MdjJvuix1ilOZgURLn1VPd7y8kkJ5YkpqdmlqQ WhRfVJqTWnyIkYmDU6qBMfaoQFjpi6P77ffX1hwWNl8gMrF70ruMIxNcDLN397+ffzb17CWh G3P2z/8t69J4g6H8+MQr6146WmssOXV5E6dM+tcfVRnPTqVe8W6+aXZZ/8xyuQeeFpGSYjwG h15NzUgO6vDZqZvr9ofj47/da6rbrC0ZyrS/V9x6GRSb/EE93udtWcPao0osxRmJhlrMRcWJ AAJ1Q29sAgAA
Subject: Re: [sipcore] consensus call: draft-roach-sipcore-priority-00: IANA registration template needed?
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 07:33:11 -0000

Hi Paul,

>We are in the process of adopting draft-roach-sipcore-priority-00 as a wg document. We already ran a WGLC on it in anticipation of the adoption.
>
>One issue raised during the WGLC was whether the document should include some sort of IANA registration template. Christer proposed this, and Keith opposed it.
>
>Christer failed to specify what he wanted to see in this template. The existing document specifies what the registry should contain: A "priority" name and a document 
>reference. "IETF Review" is required for adding new values, which ensures that there will be an RFC to reference. 
>So presumably the template would include at least these two values.
>
>Please indicate if you think the draft is ok as-is, or should be revised to include a registration template.
>
>If you favor a template, please indicate what you think it should contain.

What do you mean by "Christer failed to specify"? 

13th November I DID send text proposal to the list for the registration template. It contained Description, Reference and Contact. See copy at the end of this reply.

However, 15th November I indicated on the list that, if nobody else think a template is needed, I'll step down :)

The important thing is that it is clear to a person who want to register a value WHAT information to provide, and WHERE to send it.

Regards,

Christer


-------------------

x. Priority Header Field Value Registration Template

   Registration requests for Priority header field values
   requires submitting an Internet-Draft to the IESG.

   | Instructions are preceded by '|'.  All fields are mandatory.

   Priority header field value:

   Description:

   | The description should be no longer than 4 lines. More
   | detailed information can be provided in the specification
   | that defines the header field value.

   Priority header field value specification reference:

   | The reference to the speicification the defines the 
   | header field value.

   Contact:

   | Name(s) & email address(es) of person(s) to
   | contact for further information."

-------------------