Re: [sipcore] location-conveyance-03 just submitted

"James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com> Sun, 25 July 2010 13:33 UTC

Return-Path: <jmpolk@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464BA3A6944 for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 06:33:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.555
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=0.044, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wKDpVmxpCCpm for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 06:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD2F3A6839 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 06:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-2.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.55,257,1278288000"; d="scan'208";a="138905429"
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com ([64.102.124.12]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Jul 2010 13:33:32 +0000
Received: from jmpolk-wxp01.cisco.com (ams3-vpn-dhcp5712.cisco.com [10.61.86.79]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o6PDXURp019180; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 13:33:32 GMT
Message-Id: <201007251333.o6PDXURp019180@rtp-core-1.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 05:26:02 -0500
To: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>, "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>, "sipcore@ietf.org" <sipcore@ietf.org>
From: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F03E9DCD1AE@SISPE7MB1.comms cope.com>
References: <201007122355.o6CNt6us024310@sj-core-3.cisco.com> <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F03E9DCCFFC@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com> <201007130629.o6D6Tk7F028645@sj-core-2.cisco.com> <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F03E9DCD0D7@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com> <201007140201.o6E2138L023850@sj-core-1.cisco.com> <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F03E9DCD1AE@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [sipcore] location-conveyance-03 just submitted
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 13:33:14 -0000

At 02:08 AM 7/14/2010, Thomson, Martin wrote:
> > >The use case is basically: route based on the
> > >value, but provide a reference so that a PSAP
> > >can get better location information later; that
> > >is, updated or more accurate location.  That's
> > >not possible if the UAC does the dereference:
> > >the location information becomes fixed.
> >
> > "...UAC does the dereference"? Do you mean to
> > understand that the UAC inserts location towards
> > an intermediary, gets a rejection 424, with the
> > intermediary's version of where the UAC is -
> > possibly as a location URI, and has to
> > dereference that URI to compose the now dual location MIME body?
>
>No - I'm saying that my major issue is driven by that use 
>case.  There is (currently) no way for any entity (UAC or 
>intermediary) to insert both location by value and location by 
>reference.  There is a need for that capability.
>
> > We mean to have the intermediary do the
> > dereference (if one is needed) and compose in the
> > SIP 424 response a MIME body with both the
> > server's version or both locations of the Target,
> > and for that dual location single presence
> > document to be copied into the next SIP request
> > from that UAC (towards that same intermediary).
>
>Elegant as it is, this just doesn't work.  The UAS (PSAP, LR, 
>etc...) needs to be the entity that does the dereference.  They need 
>to do this because they know how (and when) to make this request so 
>that they get the information they need.  If the intermediary does 
>the dereference, then location information is set in stone from that 
>point onward.

specifically to this last part, if the intermediary does the 
composition - it in fact does know how to do this, but does not do it 
exactly when you may want, and you're right, this is then "in stone" 
without a subscription back to the UAC (geo-filters style) for any 
updates it needs.  I'm not sure you're gonna be able to get away from 
this whenever a PSAP gets a value BTW. It can never be 100% certain 
your getting a reachable location URI for that Target, and the PSAP 
is in the best position to do this "get/update" function.

James