Re: [sipcore] location-conveyance-03 just submitted

["Elwell, John" <[e-mail]>]

> >Unrelated to the above, concerning the text:
> >"Other URI schemas used in the location URI MUST be reviewed against
> >    the RFC 3693 [RFC3693] criteria for a Using Protocol"
> >Who must review? The protocol implementer? How is this testable?
> 
> The Geopriv "Using Protocol" is from the original requirements doc 
> from SIPPING, which is now the appendix here. It comes from RFC 3693, 
> which Geopriv is going to revise eventually with their Geopriv Arch 
> ID, that removes the use of this term.  Geopriv Arch is only an 
> update to 3693, and not a replacement, meaning 3693 will remain 
> actively appropriate, so I'm kinda caught with which to align with.
[JRE] Notwithstanding the question of whether we make use of the term "Using Protocol" or some other term, this doesn't address my concern. The present text uses the passive voice, and therefore doesn't make it clear who must review.

John