Re: [Slim] Open Issues on draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language

Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> Thu, 27 April 2017 03:11 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: slim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: slim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A41A1294B8 for <slim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 20:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yXBricATH6Y6 for <slim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 20:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x243.google.com (mail-pf0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57AE912741D for <slim@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 20:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x243.google.com with SMTP id c198so5184984pfc.0 for <slim@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 20:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ItaIbgOunfdkXIQhAGKo7UEA8LR3emzRTu+ZqI5FhtU=; b=HcRPKfOPwBzmcPxGOKLkwrawqKfcQyVG3CpoTPg/YiMEsrtn7fsyTuFeJW2yrjjkz7 aw4y4Mo+86xa2Y/2rRgVnMFcSn0nkNZakA56/EDl/mzNwbI48ypuIDSO+qoCi6g3hGZv EZJydrNtq+FuG9dtHT3oTMIyHRNQwKsg2wu8c3udLDgjDjhwY4ROt1JsvBtLy29V7m+K NOIXy5xDN3xCa0ZqL/dv173Oo85mfvlYl3gEghrVCtBkqkeNsB+snRZyAxROu2O1WpUP 8Ny+uxi6XzA9EBAYxJF2tHe9npFlZft8CZxX3eYAFvjg1Y03XiPNxe9KOcxnXZgnx7YR mPQg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ItaIbgOunfdkXIQhAGKo7UEA8LR3emzRTu+ZqI5FhtU=; b=LcXfuQW5qU+UwT0NM+uOs9l4IulYVBkFuH+2O8iGa6QdP7FiJbM2w9fzO3CLMU/0C5 8pyT1j6K448EqMmqi/cmYoSGbCZFJ0ohcA0mSOYFR6palEFfxACYeijx3w+UaI6Xllbe JwUzB+R//IOLnnvn82aSspLXrA6iEbUk/B6eu2boJw8226Xn9IOXgeul2KA5GBbLcF/V yyUjHeo9eJZ5uCiI6kLVioMHZycauplRJn6LtKt/rRpPkTmGwtJjFZxes+XXg+QiSUbv 7V8kI7CMqlvKYQ/trebmj4/ma6G3XFgNQ6rxngxR5ddb/CfhQBTXcqEDhK5zOn57Yw5L vYPg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4QRHT4Rj19dOUP6DnjILU2OivVzp30VsHSXedD3HCMGag5c+ny aQdwxJtlGdZcOfjh2Z8=
X-Received: by 10.84.222.129 with SMTP id x1mr4136809pls.44.1493262705750; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 20:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.110] (c-71-227-237-49.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [71.227.237.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x185sm1071363pfx.102.2017.04.26.20.11.44 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 26 Apr 2017 20:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (14E304)
In-Reply-To: <a3fcb80c-0c7d-db0f-8c14-5c4e09ef5773@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 20:11:44 -0700
Cc: Gunnar Hellström <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se>, slim@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9CCECC1F-464B-49F1-A71B-EBA394C4B7B2@gmail.com>
References: <CAOW+2dtU+sbM=7tYYr0m8t3D6eyKiKo_ShVhoAjaKOBuJYpdNw@mail.gmail.com> <15feb90b-15f3-8ac9-ea01-fd271a4ff086@omnitor.se> <a3fcb80c-0c7d-db0f-8c14-5c4e09ef5773@nostrum.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/slim/qT-hwTNlT_NtB-3HwTDLu9XgVEw>
Subject: Re: [Slim] Open Issues on draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language
X-BeenThere: slim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Selection of Language for Internet Media <slim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/slim>, <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/slim/>
List-Post: <mailto:slim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/slim>, <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 03:11:47 -0000

On Apr 26, 2017, at 14:15, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> Given that the direction selected by the WG is to represent language values in SDP, I think this document can *either* say that routing is 100% out of scope and unaddressed, *or* it can add some SIP-level header fields that bear on routing according to human languages. 

[BA] Given that routing work is not in the current WG Charter, my suggestion would be for the current document to say it is out of scope. But it might also say that SIP-level header fields may be defined in future (if only to make it clear that the document is not suggesting SDP-based routing).