IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Softwires] comments on draft-carpenter-softwire-sample-00

WashamFan <Washam.Fan@huaweisymantec.com> Mon, 27 September 2010 08:04 UTC

Return-Path: <Washam.Fan@huaweisymantec.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE25C3A6C95 for <softwires@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 01:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.01
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.905, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, J_CHICKENPOX_14=0.6, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lo2gG0qzgN9E for <softwires@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 01:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta2.huaweisymantec.com (unknown [218.17.155.15]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33CB3A6C94 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 01:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-disposition: inline
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Received: from hstml02-in.huaweisymantec.com ([172.26.3.42]) by hstga02-in.huaweisymantec.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.03 (built Apr 24 2009; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0L9E0062NBSSXF60@hstga02-in.huaweisymantec.com> for softwires@ietf.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:05:16 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huaweisymantec.com ([127.0.0.1]) by hstml02-in.huaweisymantec.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.03 (built Apr 24 2009; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0L9E009CKBSRLS20@hstml02-in.huaweisymantec.com> for softwires@ietf.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:05:16 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.27.154.72] by hstml02-in.huaweisymantec.com (mshttpd); Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:05:15 +0800
From: WashamFan <Washam.Fan@huaweisymantec.com>
To: softwires@ietf.org
Message-id: <fc05cb5e259f.4ca0c0bb@huaweisymantec.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:05:15 +0800
X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.3-8.03 (built Apr 24 2009; 32bit)
Content-language: en
X-Accept-Language: en
Priority: normal
Subject: [Softwires] comments on draft-carpenter-softwire-sample-00
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:04:49 -0000

Hi,

It says,

   The SAMPLE server will act as an IPv6 router.  In the simplest case,
   it will forward all IPv6 packets to a default route, except those
   whose destination address lies within the PSAMPLE prefix, which will
   be encapsulated and sent towards the host (CPE) and port indicated by
   the V4ADDR and PN values.


I think it is not appropriate to assume NAT traversal without
relay can be always successful. Hairpinning might be always used
for simplicity.

I'd like to know the status of the draft, is the WG pursuing this
work?

Thanks,
washam

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email