IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] comments on draft-carpenter-softwire-sample-00

WashamFan <Washam.Fan@huaweisymantec.com> Wed, 29 September 2010 08:19 UTC

Return-Path: <Washam.Fan@huaweisymantec.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4953A6B23 for <softwires@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 01:19:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.692, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fLrMMSA2ClJ0 for <softwires@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 01:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta1.huaweisymantec.com (unknown [218.17.155.14]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3831D3A6C4D for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 01:18:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-disposition: inline
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Received: from hstml02-in.huaweisymantec.com ([172.26.3.41]) by hstga01-in.huaweisymantec.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.03 (built Apr 24 2009; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0L9I006BJ1SIYG90@hstga01-in.huaweisymantec.com> for softwires@ietf.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:19:30 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huaweisymantec.com ([127.0.0.1]) by hstml02-in.huaweisymantec.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.03 (built Apr 24 2009; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0L9I00MF81S8UK20@hstml02-in.huaweisymantec.com> for softwires@ietf.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:19:20 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.27.154.72] by hstml02-in.huaweisymantec.com (mshttpd); Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:19:20 +0800
From: WashamFan <Washam.Fan@huaweisymantec.com>
To: Mark Townsley <townsley@cisco.com>
Message-id: <fc99c6111f26.4ca36708@huaweisymantec.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:19:20 +0800
X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.3-8.03 (built Apr 24 2009; 32bit)
Content-language: en
X-Accept-Language: en
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <4CA2F087.8010803@cisco.com>
References: <fc05cb5e259f.4ca0c0bb@huaweisymantec.com> <4CA0FBBA.3060606@gmail.com> <fbf6a71a442f.4ca1ba33@huaweisymantec.com> <E3659C1A-F894-4C8F-B952-B8BCF3E0C4AB@free.fr> <fc4aac941ff8.4ca33f5f@huaweisymantec.com> <4CA2F087.8010803@cisco.com>
Cc: softwires@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Softwires] comments on draft-carpenter-softwire-sample-00
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:19:00 -0000

>  I have one important question here: Are you looking for a solution that
>  you can convince your provider to deploy and support, or something that
>  you can setup independent of your provider? Given the situation, it
>  sounds to me like more of the latter.

Tunnels start at one point and terminate at the other. Can
you really setup IPv6 service independent of your provider?
IPv6 service should always be delivered by your provider, but
in the situation I described above, it seems to me it is hard
for those providers delivering IPv6 service over existing
complex IPv4 networks.

Thanks,
washam

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email