IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] comments on draft-carpenter-softwire-sample-00

"Yiu L. Lee" <yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com> Wed, 29 September 2010 14:13 UTC

Return-Path: <yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB2303A6AF6 for <softwires@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.865, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PtZgROFWrpxY for <softwires@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:13:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pacdcimo01.cable.comcast.com (PacdcIMO01.cable.comcast.com [24.40.8.145]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52063A6CF7 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:13:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([24.40.55.40]) by pacdcimo01.cable.comcast.com with ESMTP with TLS id 5503620.95005285; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:13:38 -0400
Received: from PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com (24.40.15.86) by pacdcexhub03.cable.comcast.com (24.40.55.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.218.12; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:13:38 -0400
Received: from 69.241.25.0 ([69.241.25.0]) by PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com ([24.40.15.86]) via Exchange Front-End Server legacywebmail.comcast.com ([24.40.8.152]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:13:37 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.26.0.100708
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:13:35 -0400
From: "Yiu L. Lee" <yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
To: WashamFan <Washam.Fan@huaweisymantec.com>, Mark Townsley <townsley@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <C8C8C1CF.3E941%yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
Thread-Topic: [Softwires] comments on draft-carpenter-softwire-sample-00
Thread-Index: Actf4IDl/HZ/sly670OrvZQlx8JfBg==
In-Reply-To: <fc99c6111f26.4ca36708@huaweisymantec.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: softwires@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Softwires] comments on draft-carpenter-softwire-sample-00
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:13:05 -0000

Hi Washam,

If I were the SP running multiple NAT layers, I would have more worry of
breaking IPv4 services than finding a way to give IPv6 to users.

Cheers,
Yiu


On 9/29/10 4:19 AM, "WashamFan" <Washam.Fan@huaweisymantec.com> wrote:

>>  I have one important question here: Are you looking for a solution that
>>  you can convince your provider to deploy and support, or something that
>>  you can setup independent of your provider? Given the situation, it
>>  sounds to me like more of the latter.
> 
> Tunnels start at one point and terminate at the other. Can
> you really setup IPv6 service independent of your provider?
> IPv6 service should always be delivered by your provider, but
> in the situation I described above, it seems to me it is hard
> for those providers delivering IPv6 service over existing
> complex IPv4 networks.
> 
> Thanks,
> washam
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> Softwires@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email