Re: [Softwires] comments on draft-carpenter-softwire-sample-00

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 27 September 2010 20:18 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F4C3A6A36 for <softwires@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.312, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_14=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MXpmenbnNkZO for <softwires@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:18:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671B43A6DB0 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:16:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so4818694bwz.31 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:17:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2DRNUikNqflbeTz3FkAs5opoE7y+x+KpAEcpXIBVbKk=; b=OENuHj5YZQax48ZyqAS0ppKtqfwlUGNtfZ485iZJcRC/zTsq7A6w627rlT6DDouNo5 I3/Ao2/aM2JUp3Yd3Df3/d4gugcIwGrRVf1oUYekrscDiuSLqOwOHlsEg22+/PBRO3Gu yH/yuRp6988eZzdV8xlHedgdxGwaV8bdKjXPs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=xSqVcG5BC/t3+SPb5LQGirGmibe7oV4YBJ/mTnLnqjDriefQuz9eNNgum0qDSmF9si c0v/M4YI5kwpOeWagJKpYOJDlWpuT5bwfGDPKwuZx913RfWxEUszb0DJxb7YTqUpu7AS uSzA6CLbHQ/RkElyCsACiglEjlylk3eyjsqZo=
Received: by 10.204.121.84 with SMTP id g20mr5864623bkr.37.1285618624452; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:17:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.216.38.124] (stf-brian.sfac.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.38.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y19sm4842428bkw.18.2010.09.27.13.17.01 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:17:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4CA0FBBA.3060606@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:16:58 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: WashamFan <Washam.Fan@huaweisymantec.com>
References: <fc05cb5e259f.4ca0c0bb@huaweisymantec.com>
In-Reply-To: <fc05cb5e259f.4ca0c0bb@huaweisymantec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: softwires@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Softwires] comments on draft-carpenter-softwire-sample-00
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:18:30 -0000

Hi,

On 2010-09-27 21:05, WashamFan wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> It says,
> 
>    The SAMPLE server will act as an IPv6 router.  In the simplest case,
>    it will forward all IPv6 packets to a default route, except those
>    whose destination address lies within the PSAMPLE prefix, which will
>    be encapsulated and sent towards the host (CPE) and port indicated by
>    the V4ADDR and PN values.
> 
> 
> I think it is not appropriate to assume NAT traversal without
> relay can be always successful. 

I don't understand your comment. If you have a NAT that you cannot
traverse with UDP, you have many other problems, not just a lack
of IPv6 connectivity.


> Hairpinning might be always used
> for simplicity.

Yes, that is the SAMPLE model. And it's a discussion for the
community whether or not this is acceptable.

> 
> I'd like to know the status of the draft, is the WG pursuing this
> work?

There are three drafts aiming at the same problem, SAMPLE,
draft-lee-softwire-6rd-udp, and draft-despres-softwire-6rdplus.
Please hold your breath, there's hope of a joint proposal
from several authors within a few days.

   Brian