IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Proposed recharter text

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 18 February 2021 17:41 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8D83A14CA for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:41:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZRNRx2jqCxuL for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:41:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99DE43A14E4 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:40:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E0CF300B90 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 12:40:40 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id uG8YcTpL9Qff for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 12:40:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A8D1300AA6; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 12:40:39 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.17\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB438056FCFE2425D7281BC9989F859@DM6PR11MB4380.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 12:40:40 -0500
Cc: LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1C94EA36-7123-4A76-BEAE-FEBCADC79182@vigilsec.com>
References: <DM6PR11MB43808FA7D74229A5997965649FBA9@DM6PR11MB4380.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <9D01B155-6BB8-4438-8FAA-149686B69B64@vigilsec.com> <BN7PR11MB254762EDB050588E65B423B2C9869@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <038A4AA3-96A5-4827-BEEB-12B58F49102B@vigilsec.com> <BN7PR11MB2547FC17A10948A912FEF6B8C9859@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <DM6PR11MB438056FCFE2425D7281BC9989F859@DM6PR11MB4380.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
To: Mike Ounsworth <Mike.Ounsworth@entrust.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.17)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/9T7uADVMotYK7u_FaQYdklFHvQo>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Proposed recharter text
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 17:41:34 -0000

Mike:

> On Feb 18, 2021, at 12:08 PM, Mike Ounsworth <Mike.Ounsworth=40entrust.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Hey Panos,
> 
> I started another chain off this thread about KEMTLS. Since it doesn't even have an I-D yet, I agree that it's waaaay premature to start chartering LAMPS for it.
> 
> I read 5a as "Assign PKIX OIDs to the stuff that falls out of the NIST competition" and nothing more. Is that the correct interpretation Russ?

Yes, that was the intent.  We may also have to say something about the conventions for various fields for the "winner" algorithms as well.

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email