IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Proposed recharter text

Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com> Thu, 11 February 2021 16:06 UTC

Return-Path: <ryan.sleevi@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E327E3A1705 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:06:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.419
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.419 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cWNn4tkIWQXB for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:06:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-f174.google.com (mail-pg1-f174.google.com [209.85.215.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3679D3A1701 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:06:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-f174.google.com with SMTP id t25so4206794pga.2 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:06:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=52ZG3j1fS0NwJtuq5yJnK/O79iyyJ7qL0aKOrkeMQ18=; b=Trh9vX8PNd2+UqQXYgNu/ATxPbmVhoEUvsB2Tg7N5eZ8v9IoH04ERXEyOsYG2l2hH5 BOJ3OX0AhMp/AD7k/PCIu4oEicpaAJ3weWt3IzOz2XM7RvlsxLdz/DqdnR8JN+Em3rsu TCGFPjOT0b+EXfD85xyitYFHsd5qmMgATnn9lLrEdXpcDthE+NBp8Rvk+Fy2iclmd5HA CPR7OrdxloOTEcsk75bS12bYt4Ad5gdoqSJenWvJePT+nuIjrXoyKX7YppJyx6Pb7eQy Ky3irxMQHJZwm5ZmTxGTgj1cB7pSEmot1mWVLbPdr21NFfp7foSa+sqPhB1c7ez1p+U0 cSig==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533stbUtqI7d+055ErXmYExQq7lTXcop9resFjgTPsbOAiEvZ+z7 YSm3VQ8nVjFogk8cmpiDgtpJBkVIayM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyKA81oPhbKOXycZKk21v363PABDTY5XPnAPQRq38mBMgsBGOuAH4Xi9cw0UL0DnNGsVM+ZJQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:7e8c:0:b029:1e1:6431:7ce with SMTP id z134-20020a627e8c0000b02901e1643107cemr8751343pfc.6.1613059571282; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:06:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-f174.google.com (mail-pf1-f174.google.com. [209.85.210.174]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id hi15sm5665458pjb.19.2021.02.11.08.06.11 for <spasm@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:06:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-f174.google.com with SMTP id 18so3961883pfz.3 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:06:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9f1a:0:b029:1de:2c09:a040 with SMTP id g26-20020aa79f1a0000b02901de2c09a040mr8867899pfr.21.1613059570929; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:06:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DM6PR11MB43808FA7D74229A5997965649FBA9@DM6PR11MB4380.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <9D01B155-6BB8-4438-8FAA-149686B69B64@vigilsec.com> <A7402F4B-33D3-4064-9E14-345B1303B1FD@akamai.com> <F94F3EAD-30C7-4B39-A00F-600234E120ED@vigilsec.com> <7F1A001A-C6D4-4F6C-B2D6-1FA43E4900B8@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <7F1A001A-C6D4-4F6C-B2D6-1FA43E4900B8@akamai.com>
From: Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 11:05:59 -0500
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAErg=HH9j3duJnS8PQvrHef9hw8qdck4fPyc=iB1ENyPrReW=g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAErg=HH9j3duJnS8PQvrHef9hw8qdck4fPyc=iB1ENyPrReW=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ba16ab05bb11b285"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/qpwobWRk68x13leKkCBagMvowzs>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Proposed recharter text
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 16:06:14 -0000

Are there even two interoperable implementations of 5280?

I do mean that in full seriousness - and it seems practically unlikely that
(2) or (3) can be satisfied...

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 11:00 AM Salz, Rich <rsalz=
40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Thanks for that detail.  This makes sense.  The charter looks good to me.
> I am interested in helping move 5280 forward.
>
> No unused features?  Do they realize this is X.509? :)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email