Re: [lamps] Proposed recharter text

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 11 February 2021 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25ECB3A16EC for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:00:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.349
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.349 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.25, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RbtBfjkV10lg for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 07:59:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A75D3A16F1 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 07:59:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122332.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 11BFnkXn023571; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 15:59:57 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=jWPJemyP0u8OZxgFp4JWXhEHsJr/RayKCnehvIP+9nQ=; b=SCfqkcvQKvLcELSfw3FP8l6uIXRGR0jqTON9WOdk1OyCm2bOGSIM6wijQ9fi/G0HqMc/ MnNnyLVFbihlf3Ogea+tdPmSEKv4ek+NR64bLrc7mJ9Kjbr/pfJFIuwl+fR2bnDT5f0F LwzGSTropezg6b3kCp+SANn83rFbMEgkUfVvcCooO0r6bmsIF3ZM6qmR0YwkLuIJpkBt PpQIUIcJG8Iz8fkVQeBSfTv/L/UzEoprgBLH0mfEyZn3rsQl/Bl8lDBbFlgBNuqALrC5 Jky4ltPpB6wh5w3RsJfg3IIeYdye5bMTaokcP6jpEGKmH8rJXCLZYG/JLG/XX+duviM6 nw==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint7 (a72-247-45-33.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.33] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36hre9m575-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 15:59:57 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 11BFn6u9017221; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 10:59:56 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.112]) by prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com with ESMTP id 36hqb3tnuf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 10:59:56 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.119) by ustx2ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.121) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:59:55 -0600
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.010; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:59:55 -0600
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
CC: LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lamps] Proposed recharter text
Thread-Index: AQHW/+p9D/RLpxKzVkq4oE9PMeAPQKpSHiOAgAFjBYD//62mAA==
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 15:59:54 +0000
Message-ID: <7F1A001A-C6D4-4F6C-B2D6-1FA43E4900B8@akamai.com>
References: <DM6PR11MB43808FA7D74229A5997965649FBA9@DM6PR11MB4380.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <9D01B155-6BB8-4438-8FAA-149686B69B64@vigilsec.com> <A7402F4B-33D3-4064-9E14-345B1303B1FD@akamai.com> <F94F3EAD-30C7-4B39-A00F-600234E120ED@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <F94F3EAD-30C7-4B39-A00F-600234E120ED@vigilsec.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.46.21020701
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.118.139]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <223E454EFB2D8C49812A45D7D3878986@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.737 definitions=2021-02-11_07:2021-02-11, 2021-02-11 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=820 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102110134
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.737 definitions=2021-02-11_07:2021-02-11, 2021-02-11 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=735 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102110134
X-Agari-Authentication-Results: mx.akamai.com; spf=${SPFResult} (sender IP is 72.247.45.33) smtp.mailfrom=rsalz@akamai.com smtp.helo=prod-mail-ppoint7
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/ni13eM8hddPXtt2My46FdGwR-Uc>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Proposed recharter text
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 16:00:00 -0000

Thanks for that detail.  This makes sense.  The charter looks good to me.  I am interested in helping move 5280 forward.

No unused features?  Do they realize this is X.509? :)