IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Proposed recharter text

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 11 February 2021 19:08 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 124B13A18AA for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 11:08:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mMqE14lpnIX1 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 11:08:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA80C3A18C3 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 11:08:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5E8300BD6 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 14:08:45 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id imNIgYVfMbg1 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 14:08:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32677300B0D; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 14:08:44 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.17\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR10MB2418C708D33E0445E46D1491FE8C9@AM0PR10MB2418.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 14:08:45 -0500
Cc: LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9C40CB29-2DB5-4A3E-838F-6E13B544CFEA@vigilsec.com>
References: <DM6PR11MB43808FA7D74229A5997965649FBA9@DM6PR11MB4380.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <9D01B155-6BB8-4438-8FAA-149686B69B64@vigilsec.com> <A7402F4B-33D3-4064-9E14-345B1303B1FD@akamai.com> <F94F3EAD-30C7-4B39-A00F-600234E120ED@vigilsec.com> <7F1A001A-C6D4-4F6C-B2D6-1FA43E4900B8@akamai.com> <AM0PR10MB2418C708D33E0445E46D1491FE8C9@AM0PR10MB2418.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
To: "Brockhaus, Hendrik" <hendrik.brockhaus@siemens.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.17)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/rxjBa3wiHYDsmnehgH6TFDT9UB8>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Proposed recharter text
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 19:08:57 -0000

Hendrik:
> 
>> Von: Spasm <spasm-bounces@ietf.org> Im Auftrag von Salz, Rich
>> 
>> Thanks for that detail.  This makes sense.  The charter looks good to me.  I
>> am interested in helping move 5280 forward.
>> 
>> No unused features?  Do they realize this is X.509? :)
> 
> X.509 further developed. Just for curiosity, is it planned to align RFC 5280 with the current version of ITU-T X.509 regarding, e.g., multiple cryptographic algorithms  public-key certificate and authorization and validation list extensions?

I think that would reduce the ability to find interoperable implementations.  RFC 5280 is aligned with X.509v3.

> Or is it planned to reduce the functionality of RFC 5280?

That is the discussion that the proposed charter text will facilitate.

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email