IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Proposed recharter text

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 11 February 2021 16:09 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42EB53A170C for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:09:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.348
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.348 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.25, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sNz707anOjZR for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:09:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD9443A1708 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:09:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122330.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 11BG99CQ016443; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 16:09:17 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=TNz1HiN5yx2spxZ0MlRLQ7KrfJqol+0E/FeC7AtB4u8=; b=NuzmAzLefNFwnkpXr4j22NQrkfcLIW1R0q5FEuKQaBwG0jccpUvnowkqvbCdd5nAX8b1 LzssJxu1vKu7Tmkkoun2mWRIhi4+6M3pKjkHBYWLUU8p3ofH0nkr6p/bb64XPMk4mmza iTVWq0p4J7As1LIZstIt+7eJNETx4EVwlJEWJ2hN4MCuBIBskLxTHm/pT1vYA32/E4Du PnYfT+DFM7Z5jNwSrcRtZDvF5jfJ525jlnQbU86Lh46FyU/YlgW67peMCjD0Iiz4SB7m MRGcIuEwlwCExEAh5Q7DdodHqaUNXW3/HemcFODwJZrydEwjj3UmD3eRSaAqNKXl+3FV 4g==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint5 (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [184.51.33.60] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36hrbdu2t2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 16:09:17 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 11BG4obm016630; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:09:17 -0800
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.113]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com with ESMTP id 36j16dcapw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:09:16 -0800
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.119) by ustx2ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.122) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 10:09:15 -0600
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.010; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 10:09:15 -0600
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com>
CC: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lamps] Proposed recharter text
Thread-Index: AQHW/+p9D/RLpxKzVkq4oE9PMeAPQKpSHiOAgAFjBYD//62mAIAAVYWA//+tCAA=
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 16:09:14 +0000
Message-ID: <1D13C815-387F-4FAD-A71F-79C3DEC11A22@akamai.com>
References: <DM6PR11MB43808FA7D74229A5997965649FBA9@DM6PR11MB4380.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <9D01B155-6BB8-4438-8FAA-149686B69B64@vigilsec.com> <A7402F4B-33D3-4064-9E14-345B1303B1FD@akamai.com> <F94F3EAD-30C7-4B39-A00F-600234E120ED@vigilsec.com> <7F1A001A-C6D4-4F6C-B2D6-1FA43E4900B8@akamai.com> <CAErg=HH9j3duJnS8PQvrHef9hw8qdck4fPyc=iB1ENyPrReW=g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAErg=HH9j3duJnS8PQvrHef9hw8qdck4fPyc=iB1ENyPrReW=g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.46.21020701
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.118.139]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1D13C815387F4FADA71F79C3DEC11A22akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.737 definitions=2021-02-11_07:2021-02-11, 2021-02-11 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102110135
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.737 definitions=2021-02-11_07:2021-02-11, 2021-02-11 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102110135
X-Agari-Authentication-Results: mx.akamai.com; spf=${SPFResult} (sender IP is 184.51.33.60) smtp.mailfrom=rsalz@akamai.com smtp.helo=prod-mail-ppoint5
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/gRakkUzl9UIQiye9lW-XKemLppk>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Proposed recharter text
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 16:09:21 -0000

  *   Are there even two interoperable implementations of 5280?

No, I think things will need to be stripped out.


  *   I do mean that in full seriousness - and it seems practically unlikely that (2) or (3) can be satisfied...

On the other hand, it seems silly to not make 5280 a standard, seems de facto anyway.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email