IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Proposed re-charter text for hybrid and dual crypto modes

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 31 January 2021 21:36 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9CFB3A1286 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 13:36:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K9NrcsL9upxd for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 13:36:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B8CA3A1285 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 13:36:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F8438994; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 16:39:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id gQr9QITFUnrh; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 16:39:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F05038980; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 16:39:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D0D65E; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 16:36:19 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Michael Jenkins <m.jenkins.364706@gmail.com>, LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAC2=hneq2Lx5Ke1fpEjSgUPvP58MBEOD9LiB6rnNRQnirqAf9A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <DM6PR11MB43808FA7D74229A5997965649FBA9@DM6PR11MB4380.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <E64102E4-AA88-4B87-814A-6C79F6655102@vigilsec.com> <CAC2=hneq2Lx5Ke1fpEjSgUPvP58MBEOD9LiB6rnNRQnirqAf9A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 16:36:19 -0500
Message-ID: <10212.1612128979@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/t_zcdU2MOnA6vnk3vTDQRRjjHLI>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Proposed re-charter text for hybrid and dual crypto modes
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 21:36:24 -0000

Michael Jenkins <m.jenkins.364706@gmail.com> wrote:
    > Not that I object to any of the work being proposed, but we seem to
    > have put paid to the notion of "limited". This is looking like PKIXme.

I hear what you are saying.
I think that things would be best if we assumed we have to open 5280.
This work is much needed PKIX-maintenance.
Spinning another WG won't change the effort involved, though.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email