Re: [spring] 6MAN WGLC: draft-ietf-6man-sids

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 04 October 2022 13:29 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9956DC14F745; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 06:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qBXqRNmM_Vy2; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 06:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x631.google.com (mail-ej1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::631]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD5E5C14F73F; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 06:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x631.google.com with SMTP id sd10so28919742ejc.2; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 06:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=bfDHeXUVnfI+tnC2ry+fTPdOfYmoGhNmNYoD13U4hXo=; b=JSPgIFQL/P2H9flDqDAp2UDN3JRQ8ie+nNmbFS9L19KY70EX8cMj34tx81fo0Ap6Wl ujGHUfCddbod53iEYlbCNCip7nSptmOgF/XdnrA92S2O9a1XF2WpFzoPL6sUP0IuX6T2 uyWYptCONy6rGWbMYirHGhmsiOBcPD51uLbjHB4c4t8yaTkNfdSRzwbnlCkKFMBTAU6n PBZ1ncUuBf2gR9K/wNDG2UkXN7vH8SdazUv1YeqL1umJnjipNpCXHCFqRs3b9NRUM1UR uHyi9/KNsMjtP5ZVh5IaIvh1QP6dM1T7SM/Bq/m0osBCVzj6ncbr9hMYW1GBYSHtNNl5 97GA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=bfDHeXUVnfI+tnC2ry+fTPdOfYmoGhNmNYoD13U4hXo=; b=jSm6FiygacMbPx9AYf34XJSNelXZ1cdBmIdM3etQJGXzRSNrGmYatQZFLEe24Xvem6 TkbW57oWBQLFXAEd+8ixovyDqBDIV1CEXe7NWYZ+jOiQ/mKMjzEssom+yjR4gmoFXANO OXT61DNTxcZXTL+t0bjPGzqhKdu3E0B1a/EEYiZbw2nRTfw3AI6jDsuIQM6t+NErGIIY hwyio+CD9CDkXVqjL4wXJQHrie+A5nC3hOaFYW867zMcLTwk4wTL3pBIyoH7x3KRzB9Q FD2a3kX5Aq58FYqAZQyDVurGevY0x0N0kjTiHGCHKbL76GYPa9z0LdAcnqtL9P2ODvvY n7bw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf09OXnlS9TKlQxviwGv3V6vzkNA6XeQ4O3ZOBNN456g2iFz3y5N zAbfQCecT0+JLE0zQtDWjDReo1Ie7qr48p/Su44PhOZkbYs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6LIKKJNsdFw4ZTDx6grhbiRx24L4ufYSvjMgXfaRRHLjiBr+nxlQBe9EDynZW+HAmNfg0/SQNvj4us5iJIw3M=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:794b:b0:787:a9ee:3bf0 with SMTP id l11-20020a170906794b00b00787a9ee3bf0mr18877868ejo.354.1664890189101; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 06:29:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFU7BARixwPZTrNQOuEw3WP-FqUsVwTj7btMTahcMbXm_NqWGw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFU7BARixwPZTrNQOuEw3WP-FqUsVwTj7btMTahcMbXm_NqWGw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 18:59:12 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn4+N31=ggO03AAQJANv7RgHaC1eNGXRUQ9B20rLK+nJyg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Cc: 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>, spring@ietf.org, 6man Chairs <6man-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-6man-sids.authors@ietf.org, spring-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004fbdad05ea357434"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/UhVMpScCAU4PxwLOJUpkCxH6YG8>
Subject: Re: [spring] 6MAN WGLC: draft-ietf-6man-sids
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 13:29:54 -0000

Hi Jen,

I support publication.

Few comments
- Introduction ends abruptly for my taste. Perhaps a few lines that state
the purpose of the document would help.
- Do we need to add some text on what happens if the address block assigned
by IANA is not used in the received IPv6 packet?
- This text "This would be useful in identifying and potentially filtering
packets at the edges of the SR Domains as described in Section 4.1.". But
section 4.1 of this I-D does not have any text for this! Do you mean some
other document?

Nits
- remove references from abstract

Further, see inline...

On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 1:30 PM Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> This email starts the 6man Working Group Last Call for the "Segment
> Identifiers in SRv6" draft
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-6man-sids).
>
> The WGLC ends on Tue, Oct 4, 23:59:59 UTC.
>
>  As the document is closely related to the work in the SPRING WG, we'd
> like the SPRING WG to review the document and discuss the following
> questions:
>
> - the action items required from SPRING (Section 4.1 and 4.2 of the
> draft,
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-6man-sids-01#section-4)
> [*]. Would it make sense to merge those open issues with the 'Open
> Issues' section of
> the SPRING document?
>

Yes!



> -  whether the document needs more guidance regarding routability of
> /16 or such requirements shall belong to some other document?  In
> particular,  shall we specify that it MUST NOT be in the DFZ? Or
> setting 'Globally Reachable = false' in the registry should be
> sufficient? The current idea is that the prefix needs to fail closed
> and not be routable by default.
>
>
I agree that some more guidance would be useful.

Thanks!
Dhruv



> [*] The draft currently refers to the individual submission instead of
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
>  - the link will be updated in the next revision.
>
> Please review the draft and send your comments to the list/
>
> --
> SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>