IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June

Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> Tue, 07 June 2016 20:47 UTC

Return-Path: <tom@herbertland.com>
X-Original-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE95112D0BF for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 13:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=herbertland-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4J2aM-Prfsar for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 13:47:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x233.google.com (mail-it0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8206712D0FE for <spud@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 13:47:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x233.google.com with SMTP id z123so107886974itg.0 for <spud@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Jun 2016 13:47:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=herbertland-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=T/XohFGivo7Dvrq/EJSpZJV1UcUuvBRE8CwMNeoWug8=; b=pMBtVzAimR2Ia68jXiM5oIrLmq+Ln1Iyz3rpI+GJBMn6g0Hijl0iX66cUatoyYukEb cg9rtYQU4HlfRiZ7iM7Fc96RtNt+Dll7hNlN96vkt73TXhGbC0gci/nztx9c7E1sA1i9 gT+q0OLSACZJm/DEtFwEPfqvRvhI3dsY1yAl4Z4o6fUgOmSwF927SIF/+/c5uDgB+RoZ +7IEUz++zeMHBaUd9ku3pH1fFs5uFSGlkZaIlFkVgh0YEF0KFB63wYKP92LEikN/UMi4 hqd4Ev1ITCXT36Hm8enCX1QEpqRFAyQaY4kwIvCL9g18ZzOVHwsRGl8ZyWsxQZbrppPE q47A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=T/XohFGivo7Dvrq/EJSpZJV1UcUuvBRE8CwMNeoWug8=; b=GUtBqjwvAaYx3OOWwjIskokkQWHFTpQzOoDgP3jZ871b0QEX/2SM5lMT23NCuynUzb Op2ufmIu5RB0UIvhvLVuizsd5oFSLl4fDe+M6Lq5Suv59HpDsh7XBX93Tp840RUdOEpt 0auWWAuyOK31QQE/HFoIS5Aej6RM5mQI2mSLEKgGNl8aDvaqwDJR2YkHlCrGllOv/bkL uN+eDrq9Q2KK12quHq4Id8g6BvlVnMIGjGb0U4zoZG2IrhK+z2XNi5KUsofqLq6MCMNi OVDpOHl1/7Q7VO3XrnUQsOpF5AaqSTjMJzWtWPmvNvPyBhPzSYO4esHEJjC7AQD9RFAo zNTA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKQxPDZW9fGEfqNQdC8KeYbWQTlW1vFo9lt1QTrdODdJCED5DAyHN3yQ5i8AWlDH/FS+Eue/4gZSQYorw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.162.131 with SMTP id l125mr2807756ioe.84.1465332448850; Tue, 07 Jun 2016 13:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.31.202 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 13:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <FE1B3918-6A8A-4905-9D09-34687DA91016@gmail.com>
References: <85E24D9D-F666-49C3-A022-2F207227A153@trammell.ch> <CAD62q9UiLi1ffGPm=xEXOSH=sqZPv7hYiNBTGvAX52a9dhV8yg@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S34kEjb4R+RCcv32TGFqGYVk6JsHWoo3t6n6qHFmjF1TpQ@mail.gmail.com> <FE1B3918-6A8A-4905-9D09-34687DA91016@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 13:47:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CALx6S37rY=JsvnxiEEa0agNr4ZX2wV6O7uoH6kPRkpNsL9XfXg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
To: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spud/gYrWDpwIIxfnUp_MxeGxsuyC9QA>
Cc: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>, spud <spud@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June
X-BeenThere: spud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Protocol Underneath Datagrams <spud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spud/>
List-Post: <mailto:spud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 20:47:31 -0000

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Jun 7, 2016, at 4:37 PM, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> wrote:
>
> 1st para of the charter says “The working group will not specify any new
> transport protocols.” and the 5th para says “The PLUS working group will
> specify a new protocol”.  I think the latter statement is correct.
> I’d like to see a comment on PLUS re-enabling ICMP functionality
>
>
> What does "re-enabling ICMP functionality" mean?
>
>
> The usefulness of many of the the ICMP signals has been reduced since you
> have no indication of who is sending them.  With PLUS you can at least have
> some confidence the sender is on the path.
>
I'm still missing it. ICMP packets have a source address which of the
router or host that is sending the packet.

Tom

> —aaron

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email