IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Status] Status of Spring

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 11 October 2013 13:00 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: status@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: status@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B0A21E8100 for <status@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 06:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.433
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.433 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.545, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WMnZHtpY2-BV for <status@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 06:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22c.google.com (mail-ie0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D85A221E8102 for <status@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 06:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id x13so8338373ief.17 for <status@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 06:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=DQfHe43kcT9jzIu/Zp8G7iojs/+T7CEfbCKv+IEEhi0=; b=aXPa0qL1e6aocwwG8/l3HQIhnnEGELuDvQvpLZh5l6yjorrYxo+OZhXhiq29KHJzZe FbDSj09fgm3EbUfbZVA66NU0UBtNHrAq21/txbJypWNGyHvlwSHmyOf0If/4dUqULnmQ un/+wjS3qBFpF00sZMAd0RvLGZeC99DUQZWMrbp9SCF/lnH68lqa9B39K1MpNcEq/nc2 /Ruki1UXuVRXrYDD3Z8zY23y3ok6QmD++8Jk9HjuwFt9hjAP/ouTOdwgSxk6Q9LyTzKX 70U0kOUsuByxszSy2uoGuiW4Sr80FQzwSoBz7fsJQlR4H876SRD+ETY0PkHrLENo6iR4 EKlA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.55.65 with SMTP id q1mr2696145igp.4.1381496402294; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 06:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.64.61.129 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 06:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20131011110724.GB29384@juniper.net>
References: <52569169.20404@cisco.com> <CA+b+ERmj13sz4yi+aQXwGKuu7boOKkz6CbcB9pYXqHV-_FMhSw@mail.gmail.com> <5256F76D.9080905@cisco.com> <7AE6A4247B044C4ABE0A5B6BF427F8E209913009@dfweml513-mbb.china.huawei.com> <339a1b4a20e74d719c7669a4f09ac337@BY2PR05MB142.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CA+b+ER=yE=mPi_CgV=8oyiykUvhd2BGVf7S7BZ36M0AF3gy0mA@mail.gmail.com> <7AE6A4247B044C4ABE0A5B6BF427F8E20991312A@dfweml513-mbb.china.huawei.com> <CA+b+ERk3Xpp3mizRhij5EMUsRcXMg4Qfh=6da-3t1S-Anf6_UQ@mail.gmail.com> <20131011110724.GB29384@juniper.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:00:02 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: w7G_i6816qk-VnhuUMKFzEgkD3g
Message-ID: <CA+b+ER=wEfYP5wdO=SFVd2Qdm2tdzBjbfYXKkvfr2wzadTE09A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
To: Hannes Gredler <hannes@juniper.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "status@ietf.org" <status@ietf.org>, AshwoodsmithPeter <Peter.AshwoodSmith@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Status] Status of Spring
X-BeenThere: status@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <status.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/status>, <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/status>
List-Post: <mailto:status@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/status>, <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:00:03 -0000

Hannes,

> please have a look at
> http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/mpls-linux/index.php?title=Main_Page

Are we talking lab/experiments or production ? Please point me to any
linux distribution which officially supports this. Also please point
me to the official linux kernel which supports mpls kernel project.

> can you point me to the text which says so.
> i could not find such a claim in rfc3031 ?

Not in rfc3031 but in rfc5036 .. pretty much the only practical
signalling protocol for mpls transport (not an overlay mpls
signalling):

   "Prefix SHOULD NOT use the label for forwarding unless its routing
    table contains an entry that exactly matches the FEC Element."

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
r.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email