IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Status] Charter security text

Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Thu, 10 October 2013 11:37 UTC

Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: status@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: status@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E4621E8103 for <status@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 04:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.465
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.465 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.134, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WjScl+5jzl7n for <status@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 04:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-3.cisco.com (ams-iport-3.cisco.com [144.254.224.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC4121E80FB for <status@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 04:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=617; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1381405044; x=1382614644; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:subject: content-transfer-encoding; bh=BB/zLq8rY9sVdAFOU7uBZbLEHTn7sGGPRV0yvJQ1450=; b=KT2fmE7EIcyEel2syowMFOyoVAxVk+kW97Y288NovyIydyGzVHR3Ijrl f47SArguExb4vDC9drSmqDH7tR5Auhrh1OW/5njrDOp2R5z053jMTYpmF z289zN47PEljTacEgJWiLK0VBzMzBoqQ2Tj2ZG+sPcR2vjZZaXdBh6h9v 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtwFAAqRVlKQ/khN/2dsb2JhbABZgwfDShZtB4JkfTQCTA0IAQGIApdwhwKaOZNxA5gFkgKDJQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,466,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="18189468"
Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([144.254.72.77]) by ams-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Oct 2013 11:37:21 +0000
Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.70.36]) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9ABbGij019568 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <status@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:37:18 GMT
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cisco.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id r9ABbEmE019338; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:37:15 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <52569169.20404@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:37:13 +0100
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "status@ietf.org" <status@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Status] Charter security text
X-BeenThere: status@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <status.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/status>, <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/status>
List-Post: <mailto:status@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/status>, <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:37:51 -0000

SPRINGers

In response to a number of IESG blocking comments I have updated
the security text in the charter to say:

"There is an assumed trust model such that any node
imposing an explicit route on a packet is assumed to
be allowed to do so, however administrative and trust
boundaries may strip explicit routes from a packet.
For each data plane technology that SPRING specifies,
a security analysis must be provided showing how protection
is provided against an attacker disrupting the network by
maliciously injecting SPRING packets."

I do not know yet whether this has been accepted.

Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email