IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1

Linhui Sun <lh.sunlinh@gmail.com> Thu, 03 December 2015 10:52 UTC

Return-Path: <lh.sunlinh@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA221B337F for <storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 02:52:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T0xm6n0pJ4wx for <storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 02:52:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49CF41B337D for <storagesync@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 02:52:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so16581144wme.1 for <storagesync@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 02:52:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=CAOtt/ccAu1UGltTYoWz9DDpYvkf+gJ2q9h2ualgQ00=; b=Lycn6Wov5/7lT+ZtDjL8YzTBCvlmj7JJyx0A33JQURtilXCqTTGAXV/XQ0qPSbnULH AAmdsb4q45yTsVxdiL4RXoPJmRORYD/h+5JSi/OMs5rHPjdt78jVZX8IpFKtuNFSzrfa p+eJ9NcF5EGUHAjQNpLsd2RJhtTZDDd1MUoZ4xsLdEfsQ80C+2Tr2xAmvJen1l0rx3OC Zs2/wqqTs99f4eET5W0f0l09+ep57KhaI5Zbi0YZkPVYMTeatTLoAoH3SgRktSLHJFy9 K7/xZgkB4P7H87kCwGZksG/CDOVbVG4zwMNJ/rYDcbCNa5D1GfAF2I+76Y1jkR5iXYEY Zd1g==
X-Received: by 10.194.84.4 with SMTP id u4mr11817686wjy.149.1449139940732; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 02:52:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.27.147 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 02:52:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <566014EA.2010705@tuxed.net>
References: <mailman.108.1449000023.26068.storagesync@ietf.org> <1449004445.2745758.455126129.5028FD2B@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAO_YprZhCmUxEf=aGCYL=+CLbjUoD1ifpDFsrS7N40Npo4wr+w@mail.gmail.com> <1449050174.3667910.455617161.12EEE3C5@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1449051540970-b577e6c2-393e54ef-bbe05be4@gmail.com> <1449052128.3674794.455635937.667C3E1F@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAPpPfeAdrCZcsYZo7=W6N14K4F2LutXN8BFTetikzKZSr8+vVA@mail.gmail.com> <259424f4.2bca.1516717ef55.Coremail.fsong@bjtu.edu.cn> <56600F0A.9000200@tuxed.net> <CAPpPfeDPHGR+vn0=ji9frF2kr+J=YR76g0e7yOndKzz97bxdHQ@mail.gmail.com> <566014EA.2010705@tuxed.net>
From: Linhui Sun <lh.sunlinh@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 18:52:01 +0800
Message-ID: <CAO_Yprbc9LMc3TmpkKpmN9hUzAix13nfuSRS5Z8jPf6xu8xjNg@mail.gmail.com>
To: François Kooman <fkooman@tuxed.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bb04d3665b48d0525fc2f29"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/storagesync/JJOfOy_wNHgoMFosjLP24ba-yOw>
Cc: fsong <fsong@bjtu.edu.cn>, storagesync <storagesync@ietf.org>, Michiel de Jong <mbdejong@mozilla.com>, Hugo González Labrador <ietf@hugo.labkode.com>
Subject: Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1
X-BeenThere: storagesync@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mechanisms to synchronize client file systems with Internet-based data storage services <storagesync.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/storagesync>, <mailto:storagesync-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/storagesync/>
List-Post: <mailto:storagesync@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:storagesync-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storagesync>, <mailto:storagesync-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 10:52:23 -0000

Hi

2015-12-03 18:09 GMT+08:00 François Kooman <fkooman@tuxed.net>:

> On 12/03/2015 10:52 AM, Michiel de Jong wrote:
> > I think we should not (try to) pick one protocol - https://xkcd.com/927/
>
> Saying that after writing your own spec ;)
>
> > I think sync *clients* should be "protocol polyglots" in the same way as
> >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_instant_messaging_clients#Protocol_support
>
> Because it worked so well for messaging clients? Yeah, I guess it works
> if you live in the year 2000 and don't care about file transfer, voice,
> video, offline messaging, receive notifications, sending pictures, group
> chats, sync between devices, usable encryption, stickers and the holy
> grail: federation. Is this not solved by Signal nowadays?
>
> In theory it is a great idea and I'd agree with you, but in practice not
> so much. KISS is key here. I'd recommend building on technology that is
> already there, working and proven and free!
>
Which technology are you talking about here?


>
> Cheers,
> François
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email