Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1

[Markus Unterwaditzer <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:28:48AM +0100, Hugo González Labrador wrote:
> Of course, the remoteStorage is targeted to browsers, so syncing does
> not make too much sense in this case. With the rise of Linux container
> micro-service based architectures, the deployment of  such highly
> complex systems should become easier and faster.

It is not exclusively targeted at browsers, although the browser's Origin-based
security model is required for sane client identification. You can totally
access remoteStorage accounts using desktop apps, a proof-of-concept exists at
https://github.com/untitaker/vdirsyncer.

Synchronization is a completely unrelated topic. I don't see how it's related
to whether the protocol is targeted at browser applications, in either case
offline sync has to work. And it does.

I don't understand what you mean with "linux container micro-service based
architectures", or how it is related to this discussion.

-- Markus

> 
> Best,
> 
> Hugo
> 
> > Regards, Linhui
> >>
> >>
> >>> Regards, Linhui
> >>>> one from the CERN EOS project (management, disk and queue servers).
> >>>>
> >>>> The Phase I has implemented the ownCloud Sync Protocol and Phase II
> >>>> will implement the SeaFile Sync Protocol. The choice of these
> >>>> protocols among others is because they are really opposed to each
> >>>> other in terms of syncing (delta vs non-delta, state-based vs log/event/git-
> >>>> based sync …), so finding a common approach is more challenging.
> >>>>
> >>>> Providing a base specification/architecture to measure the
> >>>> feasibility of this draft is one of the objectives of the project.
> >>>>
> >>>> I believe that the work being done here and in ClawIO are
> >>>> supplementary to each other and I think mutual collaboration could
> >>>> be beneficial for both sides.
> >>>>
> >>>> Also, if there is interest, the remoteStorage API can be added to
> >>>> ClawIO.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best regards,
> >>>>
> >>>> Hugo Gonzalez Labrador
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015, at 09:00 PM, [e-mail]
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> > Send Storagesync mailing list submissions to
> >>>> > [e-mail]
> >>>> >
> >>>> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >>>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storagesync or, via email,
> >>>> > send a message with subject or body 'help' to       storagesync-
> >>>> > [e-mail]
> >>>> >
> >>>> > You can reach the person managing the list at       storagesync-
> >>>> > [e-mail]
> >>>> >
> >>>> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
> >>>> > specific than "Re: Contents of Storagesync digest..." Today's
> >>>> > Topics:
> >>>> >
> >>>> >1. New version of draft-dejong-remotestorage    Internet-Draft
> >>>> >available (Michiel de Jong)    2. Re: New version of draft-dejong-
> >>>> >remotestorage Internet-Draft       available (Gihan Dias)    3.
> >>>> >Re: New version of draft-dejong-remotestorage Internet-Draft
> >>>> >available (Fei Song)
> >>>> > _______________________________________________
> >>>> > Storagesync mailing list [e-mail]
> >>>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storagesync Email had 3
> >>>> > attachments:
> >>>> > + [Storagesync] New version of draft-dejong-remotestorage Internet-
> >>>> >   Draft available   2k (message/rfc822)
> >>>> > + Re: [Storagesync] New version of draft-dejong-remotestorage Internet-
> >>>> >   Draft available   1k (message/rfc822)
> >>>> > + Re: [Storagesync] New version of draft-dejong-remotestorage Internet-
> >>>> >   Draft available   2k (message/rfc822)
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Storagesync mailing list [e-mail]
> >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storagesync
> >>

> _______________________________________________
> Storagesync mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storagesync