IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1

Linhui Sun <lh.sunlinh@gmail.com> Thu, 03 December 2015 08:59 UTC

Return-Path: <lh.sunlinh@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F0B1B32DF for <storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 00:59:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZTZ0SJdYlu46 for <storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 00:59:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68BA61B32E0 for <storagesync@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 00:59:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wmvv187 with SMTP id v187so16275761wmv.1 for <storagesync@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 00:59:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=kptdVh/newYpeLucBWdMjEWIh0FSQKLkSMyzjIaxZvY=; b=cr3nRwVOm6Ckg11aIe574jYhceWXRSKDnCtLMzue48q/IVuTSG4Yff83Ai+rib85Gu Y3gF29L44UpSsq3ERN3lmPtxBOFYy5TL0o3FdT5emSGLVMNmZHVuHnFvaJF8itAgPrMZ 35TFzFlNzjrEdfiurj9e2Ejzn+HLxa9Gm7MJ7oUUTIro+wJSNA+FwjJbZd0M11x7meiu ZXH+4XwKropF0m+tdNbD+Qp9CNU4sLOI+3yU24nIDhN2dxxWShHFtH1PIvU9vcd5YCDs OxuvIABsnXfZg9v5ctm19Cga8yHIVCm6CDLUcqTe9GHevjMFYXJJBj6FK6fRuhyGVpM/ Op3A==
X-Received: by 10.194.172.2 with SMTP id ay2mr6898102wjc.137.1449133193049; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 00:59:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.27.147 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 00:59:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <a448d31.2b40.1516700150f.Coremail.fsong@bjtu.edu.cn>
References: <mailman.108.1449000023.26068.storagesync@ietf.org> <1449004445.2745758.455126129.5028FD2B@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAO_YprZhCmUxEf=aGCYL=+CLbjUoD1ifpDFsrS7N40Npo4wr+w@mail.gmail.com> <1449050174.3667910.455617161.12EEE3C5@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1449051540970-b577e6c2-393e54ef-bbe05be4@gmail.com> <1449052128.3674794.455635937.667C3E1F@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAPpPfeAdrCZcsYZo7=W6N14K4F2LutXN8BFTetikzKZSr8+vVA@mail.gmail.com> <1449060218.3721231.455737161.5D657D6D@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAO_YprYp+cdCPQ1pEUJLcCh0uQL_mu-Y=MJOA7Oh92TWrM_tWQ@mail.gmail.com> <1449061417.3729762.455755681.08D95D5B@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAO_Ypra_PWf0Uxt2Rbp_k49hDdjq1zvTQs9qkeZqRo0v0E3+=g@mail.gmail.com> <CAPpPfeDeaTDUqNuQtiTwtWvf_3uUXNY6DTUOeRbOokf6En408A@mail.gmail.com> <a448d31.2b40.1516700150f.Coremail.fsong@bjtu.edu.cn>
From: Linhui Sun <lh.sunlinh@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 16:59:33 +0800
Message-ID: <CAO_YprZQCbVgYKZRKqqfHBMJK9NuKGA7rZZ1UeZFFGU78p=eRw@mail.gmail.com>
To: fsong <fsong@bjtu.edu.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013c6214343c350525fa9d86"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/storagesync/JQSgwJAYn-n6jVWyNygj2OFxsy8>
Cc: storagesync <storagesync@ietf.org>, fkooman <fkooman@tuxed.net>, Michiel de Jong <mbdejong@mozilla.com>, Hugo González Labrador <ietf@hugo.labkode.com>
Subject: Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1
X-BeenThere: storagesync@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mechanisms to synchronize client file systems with Internet-based data storage services <storagesync.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/storagesync>, <mailto:storagesync-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/storagesync/>
List-Post: <mailto:storagesync@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:storagesync-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storagesync>, <mailto:storagesync-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 08:59:57 -0000

2015-12-03 16:40 GMT+08:00 <fsong@bjtu.edu.cn>:

> Hi Michael,
>
>
>
> Based on the description on *http://remotestorage.io/*
> <http://remotestorage.io/> “remoteStorage-enabled apps automatically sync
> your data across all of your devices”.
>
>
>
> However, there is no synchronization in the abstract.
>
> “The protocol supports storing, retrieving, and removing individual
> documents, as well as listing the contents of an individual folder, and
> access control is based on bearer tokens”
>
>
>
> Therefore, I think:
>
> If synchronization is added into abstract, the MOVE action should be added
> for sure.
>
> If synchronization is not included, like current version, the basic
> actions in draft are enough.
>
I don't know why MOVE should be tied to the “synchronization”. It seems
that only sync allows MOVE to be used.

Regards,
Linhui

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email