Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1
Linhui Sun <lh.sunlinh@gmail.com> Wed, 02 December 2015 12:59 UTC
Return-Path: <lh.sunlinh@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7351F1A8A0F for <storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 04:59:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AC_DIV_BONANZA=0.001, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zC74EQRNVZfK for <storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 04:59:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 693771A89F2 for <storagesync@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 04:59:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so251952086wme.0 for <storagesync@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 04:59:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=fKtRzw98VzC+nJcAkVw2X7BsamsPDUwxFHdUHz5UJgQ=; b=ONKIMrneiueagm+3KuiBmM4mZgo7Yk+jzAV20Sgo58+V2FJQeFInNJX7RPKagg9Y5i hDuJsLrQGXcTdjZZJqMIexJpj58k7zgy49FFzhrK3DDJB10gVPMshgJLy3OJbCJwIKJN DRnPyrbVFSgk0XzA1bMGZqQA66ll7H5AwdmhgoBqH9cdBudw7yFBtchBbFK6Z1wdFqi+ UuDaitjCLug3zq+FM9ItM8qYAtnzGUWplzqlefOsOW0Hkx2CFvKfp6dRDwu8f1b83I56 /Qb5WCohHBX0DSSZo1uSoYOrN/WESqDmlIiGo+Xg7SgSW9SSoPzz7Q8/cIZIuH3Plc+n hGrQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.172.2 with SMTP id ay2mr1866969wjc.137.1449061169996; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 04:59:29 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.27.147 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 04:59:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1449060218.3721231.455737161.5D657D6D@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <mailman.108.1449000023.26068.storagesync@ietf.org> <1449004445.2745758.455126129.5028FD2B@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAO_YprZhCmUxEf=aGCYL=+CLbjUoD1ifpDFsrS7N40Npo4wr+w@mail.gmail.com> <1449050174.3667910.455617161.12EEE3C5@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1449051540970-b577e6c2-393e54ef-bbe05be4@gmail.com> <1449052128.3674794.455635937.667C3E1F@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAPpPfeAdrCZcsYZo7=W6N14K4F2LutXN8BFTetikzKZSr8+vVA@mail.gmail.com> <1449060218.3721231.455737161.5D657D6D@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: Linhui Sun <lh.sunlinh@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 20:59:10 +0800
Message-ID: <CAO_YprYp+cdCPQ1pEUJLcCh0uQL_mu-Y=MJOA7Oh92TWrM_tWQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hugo González Labrador <ietf@hugo.labkode.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013c62144ba8fb0525e9d831"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/storagesync/_FjHbErJBezPK5_UrOfFwYErGD0>
Cc: storagesync <storagesync@ietf.org>, Michiel de Jong <mbdejong@mozilla.com>, fkooman <fkooman@tuxed.net>
Subject: Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1
X-BeenThere: storagesync@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mechanisms to synchronize client file systems with Internet-based data storage services <storagesync.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/storagesync>, <mailto:storagesync-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/storagesync/>
List-Post: <mailto:storagesync@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:storagesync-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storagesync>, <mailto:storagesync-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 12:59:39 -0000
2015-12-02 20:43 GMT+08:00 Hugo González Labrador <ietf@hugo.labkode.com>: > > > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015, at 01:30 PM, Michiel de Jong wrote: > > Hi all! > Thanks for all your reactions to the remoteStorage Internet-Draft. > > We get the question about WebDAV a lot, in the next version we should add > a remark about it in the intro. The folder descriptions returned when you > GET a URL that ends with a / are indeed a deviation from the XML returned > by WebDAV server, and this is just because nowadays JSON is easier to use > than XML for developers, both client-side and server-side. > > > I totally agree here, this was going to happen soon or later and it is > really appreciated. > > > The fact that we don't require servers to support WebDAV's custom verbs > like PROPPATCH etc. is for three reasons: > 1) it's a lot of work to implement this without using an existing WebDAV > library > 2) in practice, a lot of WebDAV servers get it wrong, or don't implement > all of WebDAV. It's very annoying for client implementers to have to deal > with servers that e.g. chose not to implement LOCK and UNLOCK. > 3) we don't really need all these advanced features on top of standard > HTTP, just supporting GET/PUT/DELETE for resources, and adding a simple > folder description format, is enough for most applications. > > Other than that, the remoteStorage Internet-Draft specifies a *lot* more > than just how each HTTP verb should behave: > * requiring support for OAuth implicit-grant flow > * requiring ETag support and nested versioning (i.e. the folder's ETag > changes if anything within that folder changes) > * requiring CORS headers > * requiring a WebFinger announcement for service discovery > It would be easy to add these three things on top of WebDAV, instead of > putting them on top of our minimal GET/PUT/DELETE API definition. In fact, > we could probably separate it into two Internet-Drafts: one for the > 'RESTful folders' API which is our simplification of WebDAV, and a second > one for OAuth/ETags/CORS/WebFinger on top of either WebDAV or 'RESTful > folders' or whatever other HTTP-based API you want. > > > There is one requirement that all synchronisers need to handle: moving > resources. In this spec the alternative of a WebDAV MOVE is not specified. > > It is true that a MOVE could be replaced with a DELETE + UPLOAD but that > is not acceptable in most cases due to the inefficiency of such operation > (cpu, bandwidth consumption ...) > > Is there a plan to support such basic feature? > > From the current remoteStorage spec, the ownCloud sync protocol can be > implemented. The missing bit is tracking those remote moves. > I agree with Hugo that MOVE is useful, sometimes if you just rename a file it will be perfect. But the question I have is that whether we need to make two documents? Multiple choices is not good for standardization. In my view, webdav is something that we need to have a very clear decision on whether to consider it or not. Regards, Linhui > > Cheers > > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Hugo González Labrador < > ietf@hugo.labkode.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015, at 11:18 AM, Linhui Sun wrote: > > Hi > > On 周三, 12月 2, 2015 at 17:56, Hugo González Labrador <ietf@hugo.labkode.com> > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015, at 08:20 AM, Linhui Sun wrote: > > Hi > > 2015-12-02 5:14 GMT+08:00 Hugo González Labrador <ietf@hugo.labkode.com>: > > Hi, > > from my point of view the remoteStorage project addresses a subset of > the use cases of the WebDAV specification. > > The main difference I can observe is that the specification is built on > REST instead of XML-based communication. > > > I personally like much more REST than WebDAV because it is more > developer friendly and it is faster to develop. > Maybe the remoteStorage API becomes the next WebDAV :) > > However, the remoteStorage API does not provide a way of synchronising > data, this task is delegated to the developers. > Is there a plan to provide such feature based on the outcome of this > draft? > > I'm a little bit confused why you say the remoteStorage does not provide > that. Is that because remoteStorage does not perform like a typical sync > services (e.g. dropbox...) or you are saying something else? > > Yes, because it does not offer synchronisation capabilities. > > Got it. And What I am wondering is that do we need to include those > capabilities in a base specifications. Since it is hard to standardize the > capabilities like dedup or delta. Maybe a better way is to define those in > a separate specification, > > > > > Thanks for giving these examples - so by 'synchronisation capabilities' > you mean 1) deduplication and 2) delta updates? Anything else or is that an > exhaustive list? > > > > something like extensions. For a base document, we just need to define how > to perform sync operations. > > > > Yes, I agree that may be an extension of this draft could handle the > synchronisation part. > > > > > > Our Internet-Draft is heavily focused on the world wide web, whose URLs > are not content-addressable, we can't change that. So that architecture is > not very friendly to deduplication, compared to for instance BitTorrent. As > you already said, developers can still dedupe on the server-side when > storing blobs to disk, and can also dedupe on the client side before > creating the resources the client uploads. > As far as I know, delta updates are not supported by the ETag system - you > cannot do a range request to find out if certain bytes within a document > have changed. However, the folder system we define does encourage you, for > instance when you develop a To Do List app, put each task on its own > document, and then query the folder to see which of them changed, instead > of putting them all in one big document and retrieving the whole document > each time. > > Cheers, > Michiel. > > > > > > > > BTW, I want to introduce ClawIO ( <http://clawio.github.io> > http://clawio.github.io), a research > project to benchmark different synchronisation protocols against > different data backends with special attention to provide a common sync > API. > > A common API for different sync protocols is being created based on the > architecture specified in this draft (control and data servers) and the > > I cannot find a distributed architecture in this draft. It seems that they > handle metadata and content data together, just like a normal web service. > > > ClawIO is fully distributed. Every logical unit is a different server than > be scaled out. Data and Metadata channels are independent from each other > and reside on different servers. > > That is widely employed in popular sync services. And that is also > beneficial to privacy to some extent. But in the context of sync in browser > (which is mainly considered in the remoteStorage), I don't know whether > this is reasonable. But I think we should deploy distributed architecture > although it will make things complicated. > > > > Of course, the remoteStorage is targeted to browsers, so syncing does not > make too much sense in this case. > With the rise of Linux container micro-service based architectures, the > deployment of such highly complex systems should become easier and faster. > > Best, > > > Hugo > > > > Regards, > Linhui > > > > > Regards, > Linhui > > one from the CERN EOS project (management, disk and queue servers). > > The Phase I has implemented the ownCloud Sync Protocol and Phase II will > implement the SeaFile Sync Protocol. > The choice of these protocols among others is because they are really > opposed to each other in terms of syncing (delta vs non-delta, > state-based vs log/event/git-based sync …), so finding a common approach > is more challenging. > > Providing a base specification/architecture to measure the feasibility > of this draft is one of the objectives of the project. > > I believe that the work being done here and in ClawIO are supplementary > to each other and I think mutual collaboration could be beneficial for > both sides. > > Also, if there is interest, the remoteStorage API can be added to > ClawIO. > > Best regards, > > Hugo Gonzalez Labrador > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015, at 09:00 PM, storagesync-request@ietf.org wrote: > > Send Storagesync mailing list submissions to > > storagesync@ietf.org > > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storagesync> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storagesync > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > > storagesync-request@ietf.org > > > > You can reach the person managing the list at > > storagesync-owner@ietf.org > > > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > > than "Re: Contents of Storagesync digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > > > 1. New version of draft-dejong-remotestorage Internet-Draft > > available (Michiel de Jong) > > 2. Re: New version of draft-dejong-remotestorage Internet-Draft > > available (Gihan Dias) > > 3. Re: New version of draft-dejong-remotestorage Internet-Draft > > available (Fei Song) > > _______________________________________________ > > Storagesync mailing list > > Storagesync@ietf.org > > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storagesync> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storagesync > > Email had 3 attachments: > > + [Storagesync] New version of draft-dejong-remotestorage > > Internet-Draft available > > 2k (message/rfc822) > > + Re: [Storagesync] New version of draft-dejong-remotestorage > > Internet-Draft available > > 1k (message/rfc822) > > + Re: [Storagesync] New version of draft-dejong-remotestorage > > Internet-Draft available > > 2k (message/rfc822) > > _______________________________________________ > Storagesync mailing list > Storagesync@ietf.org > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storagesync> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storagesync > > > > > > >
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Hugo González Labrador
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Linhui Sun
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Fei Song
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Hugo González Labrador
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Linhui Sun
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Hugo González Labrador
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Michiel de Jong
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Hugo González Labrador
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Linhui Sun
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Hugo González Labrador
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Linhui Sun
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Michiel de Jong
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Linhui Sun
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Michiel de Jong
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Linhui Sun
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… fsong
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Linhui Sun
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… fsong
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… fsong
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Linhui Sun
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Michiel de Jong
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… fsong
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… fsong
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… fsong
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… François Kooman
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Hugo González Labrador
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Michiel de Jong
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Hugo González Labrador
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… François Kooman
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Linhui Sun
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… François Kooman
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Linhui Sun
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Linhui Sun
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Markus Unterwaditzer
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Jakub Moscicki
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Fei Song
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Fei Song
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Fei Song
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Fei Song
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Fei Song
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Fei Song
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Fei Song
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Linhui Sun
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Markus Unterwaditzer
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Markus Unterwaditzer
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Hugo González Labrador
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Markus Unterwaditzer
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Hugo González Labrador
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Sebastian Kippe
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Linhui Sun
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Linhui Sun
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Markus Unterwaditzer
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Linhui Sun
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Fei Song
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Fei Song
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Fei Song
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Fei Song
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Markus Unterwaditzer
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Markus Unterwaditzer
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Markus Unterwaditzer
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Linhui Sun
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Markus Unterwaditzer
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Linhui Sun
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Markus Unterwaditzer
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Linhui Sun
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Markus Unterwaditzer
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Linhui Sun
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Markus Unterwaditzer
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Ted Lemon
- [Storagesync] Fw: Re: Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, … Fei Song
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Linhui Sun
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Linhui Sun
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Fei Song
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Fei Song
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Ted Lemon
- [Storagesync] 回复: Re: Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, … Fei Song
- Re: [Storagesync] 回复: Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, … Ted Lemon
- [Storagesync] 回复: Re: 回复: Storagesync Digest, Vol… Fei Song
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Linhui Sun
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Fei Song
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Markus Unterwaditzer
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Markus Unterwaditzer
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Markus Unterwaditzer
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Fei Song
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Linhui Sun
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Markus Unterwaditzer
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Jakub Moscicki
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Klaas Freitag
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Jakub Moscicki
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Linhui Sun
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Jakub Moscicki
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Fei Song
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Fei Song
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Fei Song
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Fei Song
- Re: [Storagesync] Storagesync Digest, Vol 5, Issu… Fei Song