Re: [tcpm] draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Mon, 11 October 2010 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D35E23A69DF for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:50:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.179
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.179 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.580, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XYqL-tOIQR5K for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:50:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-sa01.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [147.243.1.47]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD3E3A6927 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (esdhcp030222.research.nokia.com [172.21.30.222]) by mgw-sa01.nokia.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id o9BFpbLc016046 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:51:37 +0300
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.3 at fit.nokia.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-20--732559250"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CB31ECF.6040307@gont.com.ar>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:51:25 +0300
Message-Id: <1D4E3C6E-B0BF-4CAC-A01E-EC9CDAC14EE0@nokia.com>
References: <201009301549.RAA14282@TR-Sys.de> <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456B01839E20B@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <31679F6B-0ACA-421F-8131-DA05B764A4A9@nokia.com> <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456B0201C2D1C@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <FCF0200B-A1AF-4902-A110-D7EC08C39FEC@nokia.com> <4CB31ECF.6040307@gont.com.ar>
To: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (mail.fit.nokia.com); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:51:31 +0300 (EEST)
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: "draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data.all@tools.ietf.org>, "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:50:32 -0000

Hi,

On 2010-10-11, at 17:27, Fernando Gont wrote:
> It's clear that there are two different positions on this DISCUSS:
> David's, and Jari/Ron's (probably shared by Joe, too). But it's not
> clear to me whether I should simply modify the document as indicated by
> Jari/Ron, or whether there's a middle-ground that could possibly make
> both parties happy (I'm assuming that sticking to David's position is
> not an option).

if you can find a middle ground that addresses the discusses, that would obviously also be a way forward. Please suggest one.

> (FWIW, me, I agree with David's position... but for obvious reasons I
> might be biased... hence my request for advice on how to proceed).

I'm mostly agreeing with David as well, but a significant fraction of the IESG does not. 

Lars