Re: [tcpm] draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06

[Joe Touch <[e-mail]>]

On 10/15/2010 3:00 PM, Jari Arkko wrote:
> Joe,
>
> Just a quick response on one point:
>
>> - based on the note from Jari, I can't tell whether the
>> doc is recommending SHOULD NOT for new apps or not
>
> My text did not change that aspect in any way. The new text is in the
> introduction and has no keywords. The formal requirement is later in the
> document. IIRC the current text there says SHOULD NOT for new apps.

Correct. In that case, the note was not responsive to the thread I 
raised discussing the point that this is a new and substantial change, 
one that I feel suggests that the title, abstract, and overall structure 
should be inverted to focus on SHOULD NOT as the key point.

It's hard to understand a doc that basically focuses on a change to the 
spec, and includes the SHOULD NOT almost parenthetically.

Joe